2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01393-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Tumor Marking Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Helps Achieve Better Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservative Surgery? A Systematic Review 

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent systematic review of pre-NAST tumor marking techniques, the authors use margin status as the primary outcome mesure in assessing the advantage of tumor marking [21]. Patients with pCR are even excluded from analyzes of margin status, in order to obtain the "adjusted unsatisfactory margin", since "patients with pCR cannot have an unsatisfactory margin".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent systematic review of pre-NAST tumor marking techniques, the authors use margin status as the primary outcome mesure in assessing the advantage of tumor marking [21]. Patients with pCR are even excluded from analyzes of margin status, in order to obtain the "adjusted unsatisfactory margin", since "patients with pCR cannot have an unsatisfactory margin".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta-analysis reviewing published studies on different tumor marking techniques prior to NAST concludes: "There is limited evidence that tumor marking before neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the rate of unsatisfactory margins or survival outcomes in a patient undergoing BCS after NAST" [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is some evidence that tumor marking before neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the rate of satisfactory margins in patients undergoing BCS after NAT [149]. To reduce the need for re-excision in the case of BCS after NAT, MarginProbe, associated with a lower re-excision rate, was tested [150].…”
Section: Margin Acceptability In the Case Of Neoadjuvant Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%