2016
DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2016.1175766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does transfer of control rights and private benefits of control increase efficiency? Evidence from China’s privatization of the SOE’s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Privatization of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) is recognized as one of the most important changes in public sector reform (Mehmood et al, 2013). Privatization refers to the transfer of ownership and control of property or business from the state to privately owned entities (Wang et al, 2016). There are global trends in the reform of state ownership, among them:…”
Section: Privatization In Soesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Privatization of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) is recognized as one of the most important changes in public sector reform (Mehmood et al, 2013). Privatization refers to the transfer of ownership and control of property or business from the state to privately owned entities (Wang et al, 2016). There are global trends in the reform of state ownership, among them:…”
Section: Privatization In Soesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, several indicators of SOE's financial position and efficiency after privatization also showed remarkable improvement (Rakhman, 2018) (Chakrabarti et al, 2017). Reduction of ownership in the natural sector also had many advantages, provided the sector had abundant resources and was under strict supervision by the government (Cosset et al, 2019) (Wang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Performance Of Soes After Reducing Government Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning to our understanding of Chinese markets, the literature on the book to market effect in Chinese markets remains inconclusive. Surprisingly, literature on Chinese markets mainly focuses on the issues of privatization and firm performance (Hovey et al 2003;Qi et al 2000;Wang et al 2016), IPOs aftermarket performance (Chan et al 2004;Li & Naughton, 2007), and price differentials among different classes of shares (Sun & Tong, 2000, 2003. Wang (2004) find that firm size, and book-to-market ratio, have a similar impact on stock returns to those in other markets, that is, small stocks outperform large stocks, and value stocks outperform growth stocks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3(p6) The major argument used to justify this recent privatization wave remains the conventional wisdom, which claims that the economic efficiency of the public sector is generally worse than that of the private sector, [7][8][9][10] despite ample empirical evidence to the contrary. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The public sector's non-economic roles, however, have received much less emphasis from policymakers and the academic community (with only a few exceptions 15,[18][19][20][21] ). This study draws attention to an issue largely neglected even in the few studies that focus on the public sector's welfare functions: the relationship between public sector and health.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%