2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does thermoregulatory behavior maximize reproductive fitness of natural isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans?

Abstract: BackgroundA central premise of physiological ecology is that an animal's preferred body temperature should correspond closely with the temperature maximizing performance and Darwinian fitness. Testing this co-adaptational hypothesis has been problematic for several reasons. First, reproductive fitness is the appropriate measure, but is difficult to measure in most animals. Second, no single fitness measure applies to all demographic situations, complicating interpretations. Here we test the co-adaptation hypot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
64
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
5
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitness of different wild genetic backgrounds of C. briggsae is affected differentially by rearing temperature in accord with the strong phylogeographic patterning of this species in which genotype, phenotype and geographic distribution all are associated (Prasad et al, 2011). By contrast, C. elegans shows no comparable association between phenotypes and geographic origin, including differences in temperature-dependent fecundity (Hodgkin and Doniach, 1997;Rockman and Kruglyak, 2009;Anderson et al, 2011). In particular, strains from the two most commonly isolated C. briggsae genetic groups suggest a latitudinal divide, and these two groups have been designated as 'temperate' and 'tropical' clades (Cutter et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The fitness of different wild genetic backgrounds of C. briggsae is affected differentially by rearing temperature in accord with the strong phylogeographic patterning of this species in which genotype, phenotype and geographic distribution all are associated (Prasad et al, 2011). By contrast, C. elegans shows no comparable association between phenotypes and geographic origin, including differences in temperature-dependent fecundity (Hodgkin and Doniach, 1997;Rockman and Kruglyak, 2009;Anderson et al, 2011). In particular, strains from the two most commonly isolated C. briggsae genetic groups suggest a latitudinal divide, and these two groups have been designated as 'temperate' and 'tropical' clades (Cutter et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In C. elegans (N2), the spontaneous mutation process does not appear to differ between 18°and 26°, but it does in C. briggsae (C. F. Baer, personal observation). Moreover, small differences in temperature ($1°) can result in large differences in absolute fitness in C. elegans (Anderson et al 2011;C. F. Baer, unpublished results), which suggests that at least some alleles must have very sharp temperature thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrate the importance of accounting for the thermal environment in studies of host–pathogen interactions and highlight that measuring classic fitness measures, LRS and r , within the same experiment can yield novel insights (Huey & Berrigan 2001; Anderson et al . 2011). Most importantly, we hope that these results stimulate further experimental work that directly assesses the importance of this mechanism in thermally variable environments including wild populations where poikilotherms are subject to fluctuating environmental temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%