Does the time interval between antimüllerian hormone serum sampling and initiation of ovarian stimulation affect its predictive ability in in vitro fertilization–intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist? A retrospective single-center study

Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of good-quality supernumerary blastocyst cryopreservation among women with levels <1 ng/mL versus 1–4 ng/mL

“…The AMH level was measured (Beckman Coulter Gen II assay; Associated Regional University Pathologists, Salt Lake City, UT, or Ansh Laboratories, Webster, TX) for each patient in proximity to (at most within 1 year) of COH (19). The exclusion criteria included donor oocyte IVF cases, autologous oocyte IVF cases for women with AMH >4 ng/mL, and women with no fresh transfer whether because of a freeze-all request for preimplantation genetic screening/preimplantation genetic testing or a medical indication such as severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.…”

Comparison of antral follicle count, antimullerian hormone and day 2 follicle stimulating hormone as predictor of ovarian response and clinical pregnancy rate in patient with an abnormal ovarian reserve test

“…Our findings was different from other studies which had shown that AMH is the good predictor of ovarian response in GnRH antagonist cycles, but according to our results AFC was found to be a better predictor of ovarian response in patients undergoing GnRH antagonist cycle for having abnormal ovarian reserve. [15][16][17][18][19] A study done among the Vietnamese women had also shown AMH as the best predictor of ovarian response in GnRH antagonist cycle. 20 In the present study we found that the combination of biomarker particularly AFC+AMH was found to have statistical significant association in predicting the ovarian response, whereas the other biomarker combinations like AFC+FSH and AMH+FSH did not had a significant association in the ovarian response prediction.…”

“…18 In our study we kept the AFC cut off value as 7 where it had the sensitivity as 100% but specificity was only 24.1%, and for AMH the cut off value was kept as 1.1 ng/ml for which the sensitivity and specificity was 75.4% and 40.7% respectively. We made the cut-off values based on the ESHRE (European Society of Human reproduction and Embryology) guidelines 2015.…”

What is the value of anti-Müllerian hormone in predicting the response to ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols?

“…All measurements were performed with 6 months of the initiation of ovarian stimulation. This approach has been proven to assure consistency in the predictive value of AMH [23]. Blood was drawn in serum tubes and stored at −80 °C until the analysis.…”