2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.07.316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the setup of Monte Carlo simulations influence the calculated properties and effect of gold nanoparticles?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AuNPs size [15,24,25,[29][30][31]34,[36][37][38][39], concentration [26,29,30,33,37,39] and the modelling of distribution [28,36,[38][39][40][41] are the main AuNPs properties under investigation in literature. Photon energy [12,22,[24][25][26]28,29,[31][32][33][34][36][37][38], the presence of flattening filter (FF) in clinical photon beams [15,27,30], simulation set up [42] and the user defined parameters [43] (Auger electrons activation, energy cut off, voxel size etc.) have been discussed in MC simulations from 2010 to 2019.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AuNPs size [15,24,25,[29][30][31]34,[36][37][38][39], concentration [26,29,30,33,37,39] and the modelling of distribution [28,36,[38][39][40][41] are the main AuNPs properties under investigation in literature. Photon energy [12,22,[24][25][26]28,29,[31][32][33][34][36][37][38], the presence of flattening filter (FF) in clinical photon beams [15,27,30], simulation set up [42] and the user defined parameters [43] (Auger electrons activation, energy cut off, voxel size etc.) have been discussed in MC simulations from 2010 to 2019.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%