Does the Profile of Income Inequality Matter for Economic Growth?

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract: This paper investigates the importance of the shape of the income distribution as a determinant of economic growth in a panel of countries. Using comparable data on disposable income from the Luxembourg Income Study, results show that aggregate inequality measures, such as Gini coefficients, can mask key features of the relationship between inequality and growth. In particular, inequality at the top end and bottom end of the distribution appear to have opposite effects on growth. This finding supports the argument that the profile of the income distribution, and not only its spread, helps define the impact of inequality on growth. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may

Education Inequality, Economic Growth, and Income Inequality: Evidence from Indonesia, 1996-2005

“…Fourth, the relationship between economic growth and income inequality is determined by economic incentives. Voitchovsky (2005) confirms that in a high income inequality country where skill is fully rewarded, productivity increases due to a strong incentive to invest either in physical or in human capital, which generates higher growth rates. However, Champernowe and Cowell (1998) endorse the minimal role of government where income inequality is fundamentally good for incentives, which then increase growth.…”

Inequality and growth: evidence from panel cointegration

“…Knowles [24] argues that most evidence on the growth and inequality relationship is derived from inequality data which are not fully comparable, and that a negative correlation between income inequality and growth is not robust towards consistently measured income inequality. Voitchovsky [39] points out that for the countries in the Luxembourg Income Study, inequality at the top end of the distribution is positively correlated with growth, while inequality at the bottom of the distribution is negatively correlated with subsequent growth. Lundberg and Squire [27] argue that growth and inequality are joint determinants of other variables.…”

The Effects of Income Inequality and Redistribution in Democracies: A Dynamic Panel Data Approach

“…The paper by Barro (2000) which shows a negative significant inequality impact in developing economies, applying simultaneous equation models and brings complex relationship between inequality and the fertility rate as the negative impact of inequality on economic growth is only significant when the fertility rate is omitted. Voitchovsky (2005), applying a SYS-GMM estimator, shows a negative impact of the Gini coefficient. In connection with the fact that inequality and especially redistribution may have different effects on economic growth, in the following section these effects are discussed in the light of leading studies.…”