2007
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the predictive power of self-rated health for subsequent mortality risk vary by socioeconomic status in the US?

Abstract: Background The purpose of this study is to test whether the predictive power of an individual's self-rated health (SRH) on subsequent mortality risk differs by socioeconomic status (SES) in the United States. MethodsWe use the National Health Interview Survey 1986-94 linked to Multiple Cause of Death Files 1986-97 (NHIS-MCD). Analyses are based on non-Hispanic Black and White adults 25 and older (n ¼ 358 388). Cox proportional hazard models are used to estimate the effect of SRH on mortality risk during follow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
194
2
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(41 reference statements)
22
194
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that education and income, 2 commonly used indicators of SES, may modify the associations among global SRH, age‐comparative SRH, and IHD risk: The associations were stronger among those with higher SES. This finding is consistent with those from studies of the influence of SRH on mortality 23, 24. People with higher SES may better understand their underlying health risks or objective health conditions25 and may rate their health status more negatively when they are in a worse condition compared with their less educated or affluent counterparts 23.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found that education and income, 2 commonly used indicators of SES, may modify the associations among global SRH, age‐comparative SRH, and IHD risk: The associations were stronger among those with higher SES. This finding is consistent with those from studies of the influence of SRH on mortality 23, 24. People with higher SES may better understand their underlying health risks or objective health conditions25 and may rate their health status more negatively when they are in a worse condition compared with their less educated or affluent counterparts 23.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Tal constatação torna-se importante para pesquisas que tentam quantificar e explicar iniqüidades sócio-econô-micas baseadas em saúde referida. Estudo com o mesmo objetivo, utilizando a coorte GAZEL, uma investigação prospectiva com trabalhadores de serviços públicos franceses, que incluiu uma amostra de 14 referida parece não medir verdadeiro status de saúde entre categorias sócio-econômicas mais elevadas 15,16 . Pode-se assumir que a capacidade mastigatória referida refletiu adequadamente as condições de saúde da população estudada, cuja renda foi baixa (R$585,00).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Some studies have used quartile of income as such an indicator. [60][61][62] Relative risks are calculated by specifying the fourth quartile as the reference category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%