2007
DOI: 10.3233/ves-2006-164-504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the method of sternocleidomastoid muscle activation affect the vestibular evoked myogenic potential response?

Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the effects of different methods of sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) activation on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP). Forty normal volunteers were tested using three different methods of SCM activation: sitting with the head turned away from the test ear (SIT), supine with the head held straight up (SHU), and supine with the head held up and turned away from the test ear (SHT). Dependent measures were latency, and amplitude. Head and body position significan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are reports using either head rotation or elevation, 12 , 16 , 17 , 25 , 26 and the responses are similar. 26 , 27 The head rotation method is preferred for younger or older subjects, because of the ease of maintaining that position. 14 , 26 The low asymmetry index we found validates that method for cVEMP recording in this age group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are reports using either head rotation or elevation, 12 , 16 , 17 , 25 , 26 and the responses are similar. 26 , 27 The head rotation method is preferred for younger or older subjects, because of the ease of maintaining that position. 14 , 26 The low asymmetry index we found validates that method for cVEMP recording in this age group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%