2013
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2013.839569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the medium really matter in L2 development? The validity of CALL research designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, study selection processes for meta‐analyses may not take account of important issues or features in the primary studies, such as social aspects or more subtle features of study design and procedures (Lipsey & Wilson, 2001), and may consequently exclude important and potentially relevant findings. In other words, the construction of inclusion criteria is not a neutral process, and results may be skewed through over‐ or underrepresentation (Cerezo, Baralt, Suh, & Leow, 2014).…”
Section: The Methodological Context For Msrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, study selection processes for meta‐analyses may not take account of important issues or features in the primary studies, such as social aspects or more subtle features of study design and procedures (Lipsey & Wilson, 2001), and may consequently exclude important and potentially relevant findings. In other words, the construction of inclusion criteria is not a neutral process, and results may be skewed through over‐ or underrepresentation (Cerezo, Baralt, Suh, & Leow, 2014).…”
Section: The Methodological Context For Msrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Some recent synthetic research in applied linguistics has included methodological rigor as a criterion for inclusion (e.g., Grgurović, Chapelle, & Shelley, 2013), with Cerezo et al. (2014) reviewing the validity and reliability of their selected primary research using evaluation guidelines adapted from Leow (1999). 7 This highlights a need not only for improved methodological quality in primary research but also for consideration of study quality in formulating inclusion criteria for syntheses.…”
Section: The Methodological Context For Msrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there may be no need to provide explicit grammatical explanation since the focus is to make the student process more deeply the implicit feedback or prompt being provided. These psycholinguistically motivated CALL tasks have yielded greater learning outcomes when compared to FTF instruction on specific grammatical points (Cerezo, Baralt, Suh, and Leow 2013;Grgurovic, Chapelle, and Shelley 2013).…”
Section: Pedagogical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the computer-assisted learning environment creates an opportunity for students to easily monitor their learning process and adjust their learning when they make mistakes (Hsu et al, 2015). In addition, a computer-assisted learning environment helps students gain some additional skills such as learning autonomy and computer literacy (Cerezo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%