2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-016-9806-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does the CSM really provide a consistent framework for understanding self-management?

Abstract: Despite Leventhal et al. (2016) providing a 50-year overview of their Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM), they fail to cite the null findings in relation to the CSM and adherence, as found by at least two reviews (Brandes & Mullan, 2014;Law et al., 2014).Brandes and Mullan (2014) Moderate to high heterogeneity was also evident for all dimensions apart from timeline, coherence and emotional representations, with funnel plots indicative of bias. These results are not supportive of the CSM for predictin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially since a meta-analysis of 23 datasets from 30 studies using IPQ-R in chronically ill patients (Brandes & Mullan, 2014 ) indicates moderate to high heterogeneity for all dimensions apart from timeline, coherence and emotional representations, with funnel plots indicative of bias. In a context of reproducibility issue (Wingen et al, 2019 ), the robustness of the CSM to meta-analytic investigations should be acquired (Doyle & Mullan, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially since a meta-analysis of 23 datasets from 30 studies using IPQ-R in chronically ill patients (Brandes & Mullan, 2014 ) indicates moderate to high heterogeneity for all dimensions apart from timeline, coherence and emotional representations, with funnel plots indicative of bias. In a context of reproducibility issue (Wingen et al, 2019 ), the robustness of the CSM to meta-analytic investigations should be acquired (Doyle & Mullan, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hal tersebut selaras dengan penelitian terdahulu yang menyatakan bahwa tidak ada hubungan yang signifikan antara persepsi penyakit dengan manajemen diri maupun kepatuhan. 13,14 Berdasarkan hasil penelitian tersebut, meskipun gambaran persepsi penyakit pada penderita hipertensi di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Mlati II cenderung memiliki persepsi penyakit negatif. Namun, pada hasil penelitian, tingkat manajemen dirinya tergolong tinggi.…”
Section: Berdasarkan Hasil Penelitian Ini Mayoritas Penderita Hiperte...unclassified
“…Berdasarkan penelitian lain yang menyatakan bahwa hubungan antara persepsi penyakit dengan manajemen diri tidak terlalu kuat dan menyatakan bahwa teori CSM tidak mendukung untuk memprediksi adanya kepatuhan. 13,14 Adanya perbedaan hasil penelitian pada persepsi penyakit tersebut, membuat peneliti ingin melakukan investigasi lebih lanjut terkait hubungan persepsi penyakit dengan kepatuhan manajemen diri, khususnya pada penderita hipertensi di wilayah kerja Puskesmas Mlati II.…”
unclassified
“…5,6 Si bien la falta de adherencia y control son problemas comunes en los pacientes con asma, la evidencia se tendría que centrar en determinar los factores que los expliquen. 2,3 En este sentido, los resultados de las investigaciones han mostrado que la necesidad del tratamiento (del modelo NCF) predice de mejor forma las conductas de adherencia (OR = 1.742, IC 95% [1.569, 1.934], p < 0.001) [7][8][9] que las creencias sobre la enfermedad (del modelo CSM, r = 0.04-0.13), 10,11 por lo que de este último se ha cuestionado su utilidad predictiva sobre la adherencia al tratamiento; 12 no así sobre el control y los resultados clínicos en la enfermedad (r = 0.13-0.56). [13][14][15] Con base en ambos modelos, los estudios de investigación se han centrado en particular en explicar las conductas de adherencia y de no adherencia.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified