Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles?

Contemporary scholarly discourse follows many alternative routes in addition to the three-century old tradition of publication in peer-reviewed journals. The field of HighEnergy Physics (HEP) has explored alternative communication strategies for decades, initially via the mass mailing of paper copies of preliminary manuscripts, then via the inception of the first online repositories and digital libraries.This field is uniquely placed to answer recurrent questions raised by the current trends in scholarly communication: is there an advantage for scientists to make their work available through repositories, often in preliminary form? Is there an advantage to publishing in Open Access journals? Do scientists still read journals or do they use digital repositories?The analysis of citation data demonstrates that free and immediate online dissemination of preprints creates an immense citation advantage in HEP, whereas publication in Open Access journals presents no discernible advantage. In addition, the analysis of clickstreams in the leading digital library of the field shows that HEP scientists seldom read journals, preferring preprints instead.

show abstract

“…This finding is similar to the results obtained in the fields of Astrophysics [22], Condensed Matter [23], Mathematics [24].…”

Section: Is There An Advantage To Publishing In Open Access Journals?supporting

confidence: 91%

Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many studies have looked into whether OA publications truly have citation impact advantages. More studies favoring the OA advantage exist (Antelman, 2004;Eysenbach, 2006;Gargouri, et al, 2010;Harnad & Brody, 2004;Norris, Oppenheim, & Rowland, 2008;Perkel, 2006;Xia & Nakanishi, 2012) than those that found no advantage (Craig, Plume, McVeigh, Pringle, & Amin, 2007;Davis & Fromerth, 2007;Kurtz & Henneken, 2007;Moed, 2007).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 96%

University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study

Yang

Liu

2015

Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this study was to understand TAMU faculty awareness of open access (OA) publishing; assess their attitudes towards, and willingness to, contribute to an institutional repository (IR); and investigate their perceptions of newer OA trends and resources, including Open Educational Resources (OER) and DMPTool. The survey also served as an outreach tool to inform and educate TAMU faculty about OA publishing, the IR, and the Libraries' OA services. METHODS The 34-question survey was conducted between Nov. 6-Dec 15, 2014 using Qualtrics, a web-based survey tool. Responses were anonymous, and participants were prevented from answering the survey more than once. Two hundred ninety-five faculty responded to the survey, resulting in a response rate of 11 percent. RESULTS Survey results suggest that tenured faculty are more engaged and interested in OA publishing topics in general, and tenure-track faculty are more willing to adopt new initiative such as Open Textbooks. Overall, the responding TAMU faculty are willing to consider publishing in OA publications, and almost half of them believe OA journal publications are acceptable for consideration of tenure and promotion in their departments. Despite their positive attitudes towards OA publishing, they are not so positive towards OA mandates. The survey also revealed there is a low awareness level of the TAMU IR, as well as of newer OA trends and resources. CONCLUSION The majority of responding TAMU faculty are aware of OA journals in their fields, and indicated their willingness to publish in an OA publication. Being unaware of the IR deposit process stood out as the greatest barrier that accounts for the low IR participation rate at TAMU. In line with previous studies, copyright concerns, as well as the perception of IR contents as being of lower quality, are the second most significant barriers. Workshops or seminars on copyright, data management, and the IR are badly needed. Several participants appreciated this survey because it provided many web links to the resources mentioned for them to explore further, and as a result they learned a lot from the survey. Despite our best efforts to make faculty aware of the abundance of resources made available by the Libraries, it seems that our audience continues to remain unaware of some of our services and resources. This only reinforces the need for continuous communication-after all, there is no such thing as too many reminders.

show abstract

“…Several studies have failed to show an OA citation advantage (Davis & Fromerth, 2007;Kurtz & Henneken, 2007;Moed, 2007). In a well-designed controlled trial involving the random selection of articles for OA status from a publisher's corpus, no evidence was found for an OA citation advantage (Davis et al, 2008).…”

Section: Citation Advantagementioning

confidence: 99%

Open Access Issues and Engineering Faculty Attitudes and Practices

Mischo

Schlembach

2011

Journal of Library Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. The two primary means for accomplishing Open Access (OA) goals are the "author pays" or Gold model and the "self-archiving" or Green model, both of which can have variations or hybrids. There is a growing schism between proponents of the Gold and Green models. Scholar uptake on self-archiving has been very limited. At the same time, a great deal of concern has been expressed regarding the Gold model, particularly with regard to cost and the role of peer-review lite journals. With the evolving OA environment as a backdrop, the authors conducted a survey of university engineering faculty in order to better understand their OA practices and attitudes. The scholarly communication needs and activities of engineering faculty are more diverse than other scholars in that they have a broader and more varied literature, which includes journal articles, conference papers, technical reports, standards, handbook information, patents, and grey literature. The survey was comprised of 12 Likert scale questions and 3 open comment questions. The results of the survey of engineering faculty were consistent with other studies that have revealed concerns over the author pays model and a reluctance to self-archive in the university institutional repository (IR). Survey results showed that engineering faculty do not extensively publish in author pays Gold journals and had limited plans to do so in the future. In line with other studies, the survey revealed that there was a lack of familiarity with campus IRs and a very small uptake rate for depositing research output in institutional repositories.

show abstract

Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles?

Cited by 152 publications

References 10 publications

Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics

Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics

University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study

Open Access Issues and Engineering Faculty Attitudes and Practices

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About