University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study

Abstract

INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this study was to understand TAMU faculty awareness of open access (OA) publishing; assess their attitudes towards, and willingness to, contribute to an institutional repository (IR); and investigate their perceptions of newer OA trends and resources, including Open Educational Resources (OER) and DMPTool. The survey also served as an outreach tool to inform and educate TAMU faculty about OA publishing, the IR, and the Libraries' OA services. METHODS The 34-question survey was conducted between Nov. 6-Dec 15, 2014 using Qualtrics, a web-based survey tool. Responses were anonymous, and participants were prevented from answering the survey more than once. Two hundred ninety-five faculty responded to the survey, resulting in a response rate of 11 percent. RESULTS Survey results suggest that tenured faculty are more engaged and interested in OA publishing topics in general, and tenure-track faculty are more willing to adopt new initiative such as Open Textbooks. Overall, the responding TAMU faculty are willing to consider publishing in OA publications, and almost half of them believe OA journal publications are acceptable for consideration of tenure and promotion in their departments. Despite their positive attitudes towards OA publishing, they are not so positive towards OA mandates. The survey also revealed there is a low awareness level of the TAMU IR, as well as of newer OA trends and resources. CONCLUSION The majority of responding TAMU faculty are aware of OA journals in their fields, and indicated their willingness to publish in an OA publication. Being unaware of the IR deposit process stood out as the greatest barrier that accounts for the low IR participation rate at TAMU. In line with previous studies, copyright concerns, as well as the perception of IR contents as being of lower quality, are the second most significant barriers. Workshops or seminars on copyright, data management, and the IR are badly needed. Several participants appreciated this survey because it provided many web links to the resources mentioned for them to explore further, and as a result they learned a lot from the survey. Despite our best efforts to make faculty aware of the abundance of resources made available by the Libraries, it seems that our audience continues to remain unaware of some of our services and resources. This only reinforces the need for continuous communication-after all, there is no such thing as too many reminders.

Open Access Awareness and Perceptions in an Institutional Landscape

“…It was also found that senior researchers were more likely to offer open access to their publications than junior researchers (Lwoga & Questier, 2015). The Texas A&M University has had an institutional open access policy since 2013, and despite its short existence, the degree of awareness of the policy and the institutional repository among professors and researchers is high (Yang and Li, 2015). However, the biggest difficulty found by its researchers was how to deposit documents, followed by concerns about copyright issues and the feeling that the contents of the repository were of lower quality.…”

“…The respondents most often found the policy on the website of the journal or publisher and, if they were unable to find it, they asked for permission to add their documents to the repository. Continuing in order of frequency, the researchers used the library services or (Creaser et al, 2010;Frass, Cross, & Gardner, 2014;Kim, 2011;Yang & Li, 2015). Many of the respondents have now changed from an attitude of concern to one of actively seeking editorial policies, which means that they have found a motivation for depositing their documents in the institutional repository.…”

Green on What Side of the Fence? Librarian Perceptions of Accepted Author Manuscripts

“…Of particular relevance to this paper, the authors assert that "it is likely that, for the short term at the very least, green and gold OA models will continue to complement each other" (Rowley et al, 2017(Rowley et al, , p. 1209. Yang and Li's (2015) study of Texas A&M University faculty attitudes toward OA and institutional repositories found strong awareness of OA, along with concerns regarding mandates and scholarly quality. Much of their work confirmed previous studies on barriers to repository participation, which included concerns over quality.…”

The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: Attempting to Cut through the Gordian Knot of the Complexities of Funder Mandates, Publisher Embargoes and Researcher Caution in Achieving Open Access

“…Nevertheless, the scholarly reward system continues to mean that academics trade their copyright to publish in their preferred journals, which has thus far been seen as more advantageous to them compared with any benefits they could gain from retaining their copyright [26,32,40]. It has been shown that many academics believe that publishing in traditional journals is most likely to contribute to promotions and pay rises, rather than making their work available in an OA form [41][42][43].…”