2023
DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does social cognition change? Evidence after 4 years from the Italian Network for Research on Psychoses

Abstract: This peer-reviewed article has been accepted for publication but not yet copyedited or typeset, and so may be subject to change during the production process. The article is considered published and may be cited using its DOI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the TASIT was initially developed for assessing social inference difficulties in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (McDonald et al 2003) it has also been used to assess social cognition in individuals with psychiatric diagnosis. For example, in individuals with schizophrenia, TASIT performance has been used to define clusters based on level of social impairment (Rocca et al 2016) and to assess the association between improvements in clinical and social inference domains (Rocca et al 2023).…”
Section: Dissecting Social Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the TASIT was initially developed for assessing social inference difficulties in individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (McDonald et al 2003) it has also been used to assess social cognition in individuals with psychiatric diagnosis. For example, in individuals with schizophrenia, TASIT performance has been used to define clusters based on level of social impairment (Rocca et al 2016) and to assess the association between improvements in clinical and social inference domains (Rocca et al 2023).…”
Section: Dissecting Social Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since many studies have used assessment instruments that include items related to neurocognition and that focus on behavioral manifestations, rather than on internal experiences, for the evaluation of negative symptoms, it is difficult to say whether commonalities between the two dimensions are partly explained by these confounders [8]. An overlap between negative symptoms and CI may also be due to shared underlying mechanisms: an impairment of EF, for instance, might interfere with the goal-directed behavior needed for achieving a reward, which is conceptualized as a pathophysiological mechanism underlying the MAP [5], and poor social cognition might result in or be the result of asociality [5,65]. In addition, the EXP domain of negative symptoms (blunted affect and alogia) might be underpinned by deficits in social cognition and neurocognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original conceptions of schizophrenia, language disorder is considered very important (Bleuler, 1911). Formal thought disorder is part of the disorganised dimension of schizophrenia (Maj et al, 2021); and is closely related to neurocognition (Minor et al, 2015); and it is the psychotic symptoms whose contribution to the functioning of the presenting subjects is most significant (Rocca et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%