Does social capital travel? Influences on the life satisfaction of young people living in England and Spain

Abstract

BackgroundThis study used a social capital framework to examine the relationship between a set of potential protective ('health assets') factors and the wellbeing of 15 year adolescents living in Spain and England. The overall purpose of the study was to compare the consistency of these relationships between countries and to investigate their respective relative importance.MethodsData were drawn from the 2002, English and Spanish components of the WHO Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) survey A total of 3,591 respondents (1884, Spain; 1707, England) aged 15, drawn from random samples of students in 215 and 80 schools respectively were included in the study. A series of univariate, bivariate and multivariate (general linear modelling and decision tree) analyses were used to establish the relationships.ResultsResults showed that the wellbeing of Spanish and English adolescents is similar and good. Three measures of social capital and 2 measures of social support were found to be important factors in the general linear model. Namely, family autonomy and control; family and school sense of belonging; and social support at home and school. However, there were differences in how the sub components of social capital manifest themselves in each country--feelings of autonomy of control, were more important in England and social support factors in Spain.ConclusionsThere is some evidence to suggest that social capital (and its related concept of social support) do travel and are applicable to young people living in Spain and England. Given the different constellation of assets found in each country, it is not possible to define exactly the precise formula for applying social capital across cultures. This should more appropriately be defined at the programme planning stage.

Social capital and the mental health of children in rural China with different experiences of parental migration

“…Studies have demonstrated that higher levels of family social capital are associated with better mental health in children (Almedom, 2005;Dorsey and Forehand, 2003;Morrow, 1999;Wu et al, 2010a). For example, Morgan et al (2012) analyzed data from 3591 adolescents in England and Spain, finding that two measures of family social capital, family autonomy and control and family sense of belonging, were significantly related to adolescents' life satisfaction in both countries. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY79) in the United States, Dufur et al's (2008) study on 1833 children aged 5e14 years also demonstrated that family social capital, assessed by parents' knowledge of the child's activities and potential time spent with children, was strongly predictive of better child social adjustment.…”

How different contexts of social capital are associated with self-rated health among Lithuanian high-school students

“…This also suggests the multi-contextual nature of social capital, identifying the different social networks that contribute to securing adolescents’ sense of belonging. Other studies suggest that, by assessing the relative importance of adolescents’ social capital within the family, school, and neighborhood contexts, a better understanding of the impact of these contexts on adolescents’ self-rated health will be obtained [23]. …”

Trends in Life Satisfaction and Self-rated Health in Czech School-aged Children: HBSC Study.

“…LS as well as SRH are seen to be important components of broader strategies oriented to improve health and overall quality of life for children and young people (29).…”