2019
DOI: 10.21831/cp.v38i1.22181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Sleep Quality Serve as a Mediator Between Well-Being and Academic Achievement?

Abstract: The transition from high school to college "forces" freshmen students to lead a brand new life until they eventually manage to adapt to the new environment and all its activities. Freshmen students who failed to adapt themselves to the environment will face various problems including the degradation of well-being which consequently affects their academic achievement and gets worse when it affects their sleep quality. This expost facto research design aims to examine whether sleep quality serves as a mediator b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For life satisfaction, the respondents were supposed to answer the one question asking them about "how they are satisfied with life as a whole? While for happiness, the question was about "how they are happy they are in nowadays" Life satisfaction was measured using scale of life satisfaction by Ayriza, Setiawati, Nurhayati, & Gumelar (2019) rated from 1 = "not at all satisfied" to 5 = "completely satisfied" whereas happiness rated from 1 = "very unhappy" to 4= "very happy" and both of them by Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin (1985). Educational level affects SWB (Kuroki, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For life satisfaction, the respondents were supposed to answer the one question asking them about "how they are satisfied with life as a whole? While for happiness, the question was about "how they are happy they are in nowadays" Life satisfaction was measured using scale of life satisfaction by Ayriza, Setiawati, Nurhayati, & Gumelar (2019) rated from 1 = "not at all satisfied" to 5 = "completely satisfied" whereas happiness rated from 1 = "very unhappy" to 4= "very happy" and both of them by Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin (1985). Educational level affects SWB (Kuroki, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, positive affect (â = -0.08, á <0.01) has a significant negative relationship with student achievement. According to Ayriza, Setiawati, Nurhayati, Gumelar, & Sholeha (2019), dimensions of wellbeing such as positive affect and life satisfaction negatively affect student achievement. During the experience of positive affect and life satisfaction, students may not be aware of that and thus don't derive any academic benefits from that.…”
Section:  Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secara teknis, penyerahan kuesioner dilakukan secara online yaitu pendistribusian kuesioner yang dilakukan secara online atau dalam jaringan yang menggunakan metode atau cara dari google form. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah Skala Kualitas Kehidupan di Sekolah/QSL, Skala Kelelahan Emosional Guru/Pendidik menggunakan skala (MBI/Maslach Burnout Inventory) dan Skala Kesejahteraan Subjektif (SWB) menggunakan skala PANAS (Positive Affect and Negatif Affect Schedule) (Ayriza et al, 2019). Nilai validitas QSL sebesar 0,707 dan reliabilitasnya sebesar 0,850, untuk Burnout validitasnya sebesar 0,643 dan reliabilitasnya 0,856 dan untuk Skala Kesejahteraan Subjektif validitasnya 0,658 dan reliabilitasnya 0,749.…”
Section: Metodologiunclassified