Does size matter for port coopetition strategy? Concept, motivation and implication

Abstract

Coopetition is one of the emerging strategies for ports to react towards the rapidly changing market environment. Having this strategy in action, ports will simultaneously compete and cooperate to achieve commonly interesting goals among players involved. Several ports in the Hamburg-Le Havre range have already decided to use such coopetitive strategies. The literature, however, shows that there exist a number of case-specific motivations for having employed this strategy. The aim of this paper is to investigate the motivations for the ports of Flanders (Antwerp, Zeebrugge, Ghent and Ostend) to choose coopetition. These four Flemish ports recently agreed to collaborate after several years of negotiations. It was known that the large port of Antwerp was more reluctant to collaborate with the smaller ports: Zeebrugge, Ghent and Ostend. This fact does naturally lead us to consider whether the size of port is a factor having an impact on the coopetitive strategy. The current paper attempts to examine the possible impact of size difference on the motivations for ports to opt for coopetition, within a framework of coopetition motivations based on a literature review. From a qualitative analysis on the matter, the paper concludes that size is not an important factor for the motivations to establish coopetition since ports are mainly aimed at achieving a win-win situation. Other factors, such as similarities in the services offered and competition level, look more influential. Nevertheless, the size difference among the ports seems to have an impact on the choice of the type of coopetition and on the willingness of the ports to adopt this strategy. Finally, the paper indicates that it is beneficial for all the ports to investigate the use of coopetition as a way of expanding the network of logistics services.

Evaluating the Environmental Performance and Operational Efficiency of Container Ports: An Application to the Maritime Silk Road

“…Zhuang et al [15] used two duopoly games, a Stackelberg game and a simultaneous game, to model port competition where ports provided differentiated services in the sectors of containerized cargo and dry-bulk cargo. Song et al [16] investigated motivations for the ports of Flanders (Antwerp, Zeebrugge, Ghent, and Ostend) to choose the strategy of coopetition, the combination of competition and cooperation, to respond to the rapidly changing market environment. Notteboom and Yang [17] illustrated governance factors that have triggered a number of strategic and managerial implications on Chinese ports.…”

A typology of horizontal logistics collaboration concepts: an illustrative case study from agri-food supply chains

“…Collaboration can also take place between potential competitors, i.e. partners who are not yet on the same competitive market but share a high level of technological similarity (Song et al , 2015).…”

Identifying port maritime communities: application to the Spanish case

“…Due to the rapid changes in the maritime sector, several strategies have emerged to quickly adapt to these changes, such as coopetition, whereby ports compete and cooperate simultaneously to achieve objectives of common interest among the actors involved [ 54 ]. Coopetition may vary according to different combinations of terminal ownership [ 39 ] and may be especially suitable in uncertain scenarios [ 64 ].…”