2013
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does sex-ratio selection influence nest-site choice in a reptile with temperature-dependent sex determination?

Abstract: Evolutionary theory predicts that dioecious species should produce a balanced primary sex ratio maintained by frequency-dependent selection. Organisms with environmental sex determination, however, are vulnerable to maladaptive sex ratios, because environmental conditions vary spatio-temporally. For reptiles with temperature-dependent sex determination, nest-site choice is a behavioural maternal effect that could respond to sex-ratio selection, as mothers could adjust offspring sex ratios by choosing nest site… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
52
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a small-bodied freshwater species, Refsnider et al (2013b) concluded that maternal adjustment of nest depth is unlikely to significantly improve offspring sex ratio skews, suggesting instead that shifts in components of nest site choice, rather than nest depth, may be a more profitable maternal response. Indeed, in comparing painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) neonates from maternally selected nest sites with those from randomly selected nest sites, Mitchell et al (2013) recently presented evidence that sex ratio selection appears to be an important component of nest site choice in reptiles with TSD, supporting theories that behavioral plasticity will be a key factor in ensuring the reproductive success of reptiles. Given that marine turtles exhibit natal philopatry and site fidelity, the choices available to a nesting female when choosing a nest site are limited (Lutz et al 2003;Hawkes et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In a small-bodied freshwater species, Refsnider et al (2013b) concluded that maternal adjustment of nest depth is unlikely to significantly improve offspring sex ratio skews, suggesting instead that shifts in components of nest site choice, rather than nest depth, may be a more profitable maternal response. Indeed, in comparing painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) neonates from maternally selected nest sites with those from randomly selected nest sites, Mitchell et al (2013) recently presented evidence that sex ratio selection appears to be an important component of nest site choice in reptiles with TSD, supporting theories that behavioral plasticity will be a key factor in ensuring the reproductive success of reptiles. Given that marine turtles exhibit natal philopatry and site fidelity, the choices available to a nesting female when choosing a nest site are limited (Lutz et al 2003;Hawkes et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Using Gap Light Analyzer software (ver. 2.0; Frazer et al 1999), we estimated canopy cover (% shade) and incident solar radiation (MJ m 22 day 21 ) over the course of development for each nest from these photographs (Doody et al 2006;Mitchell et al 2013). Nest predation is high at our site, so we placed a metal screen over each nest (a 1 # 1-cm mesh aluminum hardware cloth, staked to the ground) to guard nests from predators.…”
Section: Study Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For oviparous vertebrates, the choice of where to lay one's eggs is the final and most important choice for enhancing offspring survival, and therefore fitness, as most fish, amphibians and reptiles lack parental care after oviposition [51]. Such choices are increasingly understood to be quite sophisticated; for example, mosquitoes can not only discriminate predator presence but quantify varying degrees of risk [25] and turtles appear to choose oviposition sites in order to balance offspring sex ratio [52]. However, the ways that females make decisions when facing conflicting indicators of offspring survival and development is less well understood (but see [38,39]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%