2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0016672311000267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does selection or genetic drift explain geographic differentiation of morphological characters in house sparrowsPasser domesticus?

Abstract: Understanding the relative influence of genetic drift and selection is fundamental in evolutionary biology. The theory of neutrality predicts that the genetic differentiation of a quantitative trait (QST) equals the genetic differentiation at neutral molecular markers (FST) if the quantitative trait has not been under selection. Thus, the relative magnitude of observed QST and expected QST under neutral expectations suggests the importance of selection and genetic drift for any observed phenotypic divergence. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, evidence was found for body mass P ST exceeding F ST in both male and female House Sparrow populations on a similar spatial scale in Norway (Holand et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, evidence was found for body mass P ST exceeding F ST in both male and female House Sparrow populations on a similar spatial scale in Norway (Holand et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some studies have applied this approach to explore the critical ratio of between‐population additive genetic variance ( c ) to within‐population additive variance relative to total variance to test the robustness of their P ST estimates and confirm the conclusions drawn from P ST – F ST comparisons (e.g. Holand et al ., ; Mobley et al ., ; Mariani et al ., ). Although most of these studies have found that environmental effects impact the estimates of trait divergence, it has been repeatedly demonstrated that the number of lateral plates in laboratory‐reared sticklebacks is generally not influenced by rearing environment (Colosimo et al ., ; McGuigan et al ., ; but see: McCairns & Bernatchez, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The potential geographic variation suggested here is not unusual because in a number of species with broad geographic ranges, such as the Northern Cardinal (Halkin and Linville 1999), variation in ornament expression and information content has been found between populations (Roulin et al 2009, Holand et al 2011, Dey et al 2012, Simpson et al 2015, ArgĂźelles-TicĂł et al 2016. For example, in the Common Yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), ornaments that are the focus of mate choice and that co-vary with condition and behavior in males vary between populations (Thusius et al 2001, Freeman-Gallent et al 2010, Whittingham et al 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%