2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2010.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does scavenging extend the host range of entomopathogenic nematodes (Nematoda: Steinernematidae)?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, differences in foraging behavior might explain the ability of these species to coexist. Similar factors might also explain the coexistence of Steinernema affine (Bovien) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and Steinernema kraussei (Steiner) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) in central European oak woodland habitats (Půža & Mráček, 2010a). Interestingly, under certain soil conditions or in the presence of roots, the foraging behavior of S. carpocapsae apparently departs from the usual ambushing paradigm: they travel greater distances, move more deeply into the soil profile, use roots as "routeways", penetrate into the roots themselves, and effectively attack root-feeding larvae (Griffin, 2012;Wilson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Competition and Displacementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, differences in foraging behavior might explain the ability of these species to coexist. Similar factors might also explain the coexistence of Steinernema affine (Bovien) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and Steinernema kraussei (Steiner) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) in central European oak woodland habitats (Půža & Mráček, 2010a). Interestingly, under certain soil conditions or in the presence of roots, the foraging behavior of S. carpocapsae apparently departs from the usual ambushing paradigm: they travel greater distances, move more deeply into the soil profile, use roots as "routeways", penetrate into the roots themselves, and effectively attack root-feeding larvae (Griffin, 2012;Wilson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Competition and Displacementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…). However, research on susceptibility of wireworms to entomopathogenic nematodes has been limited and produced inconsistent results (Eidt and Thurston ; Campos‐Herrera and Gutierrez ; Půža and Mráček ). Studies with A. lineatus larvae showed no susceptibility to Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) and mortality between 17% and 67% with various Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar strains (Ansari et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). However, most of the research on wireworm control with EPNs did not specify the insect species nor the larval stage of the wireworm tested (Campos‐Herrera and Gutierrez ; Půža and Mráček ; San‐Blas et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although EPNs are considered obligate parasites of a large number of arthropod species, they can scavenge insect cadavers under certain circumstances (Pů ža and Mráček, 2010;San-Blas and Gowen, 2008). EPNs are vectors of enteric bacteria (Xenorhabdus for steinernematids and Photorhabdus for heterorhabditids) that act synergistically with the nematodes to kill the host and then share the tissues for development and reproduction (Boemare, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%