2007
DOI: 10.1002/mar.20189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does santa have a great job? Gift shopping value and satisfaction

Abstract: For good or bad, shopping and gifting are intertwined. This research looks at sources of gratification associated with shopping for gifts. More particularly, the roles played by general and specific shopping orientations in shaping gift shopping value and satisfaction are examined. Results from testing a theoretical model suggest that gift shopping orientations, such as agape, may dominate general shopping orientations, such as price consciousness. Also, the important role played by utilitarian shopping value … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2) wrote "The only gift is a portion of thyself." At that time, gift-giving research was mostly interpersonal (giving to others) and it remains that way (Heath et al, 2011) with recent studies considering interpersonal gifting in business (Bodur & Grohmann, 2005), in romantic relationships (Schiffman & Cohn, 2009), in different cultures (Kimel, Grossmann, & Kitayama, 2012;Lotz, Shim, & Gehrt, 2003), for pets (Tesfom & Birch, 2010), and miscellaneous extensions of interpersonal gifting (Babin et al, 2007;Moreau, Bonney, & Herd, 2011). Even with this interpersonal emphasis, self-gifting has become a relevant though understudied aspect of the gifting literature (Heath et al, 2011;Ward & Tran, 2008).…”
Section: Self Versus Interpersonal Gift (Ig) Givingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…2) wrote "The only gift is a portion of thyself." At that time, gift-giving research was mostly interpersonal (giving to others) and it remains that way (Heath et al, 2011) with recent studies considering interpersonal gifting in business (Bodur & Grohmann, 2005), in romantic relationships (Schiffman & Cohn, 2009), in different cultures (Kimel, Grossmann, & Kitayama, 2012;Lotz, Shim, & Gehrt, 2003), for pets (Tesfom & Birch, 2010), and miscellaneous extensions of interpersonal gifting (Babin et al, 2007;Moreau, Bonney, & Herd, 2011). Even with this interpersonal emphasis, self-gifting has become a relevant though understudied aspect of the gifting literature (Heath et al, 2011;Ward & Tran, 2008).…”
Section: Self Versus Interpersonal Gift (Ig) Givingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In marketing and consumer research, indebtedness mostly appears in studies of gift giving or receiving (Babin et al 2007;Larsen and Watson 2001), because receiving gifts can lead the recipient to feel indebted and perceive a need to reciprocate, which can further produce embarrassment or a sense of dependence (Belk and Coon 1993;Joy 2001).…”
Section: Gratitude and Indebtednessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Kniveton (2005) found the evidence suggesting that from the less tangible benefi ts of the process-oriented experience aspects of membership, customers create affective and psychological bonds that can enhance satisfaction and loyalty. In the context of gift shopping, both utilitarian (tangibles) and hedonic (entertainment, emotional, social) benefi ts arise from shopping are related to consumer satisfaction (Babin, Gonzalez & Watts 2007). Similarly, utilitarian and hedonic benefi ts were found to predict outcomes such as satisfaction (Babin, Babin et al 1994).…”
Section: Literature Review Loyalty Program Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%