2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12122-008-9051-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Public or Not-for-Profit Status Affect the Earnings of Hospital Workers?

Abstract: This paper examines the earnings differentials among hospital workers in the public, private nonprofit, and private for-profit sectors. Utilizing data from the 1995 through 2007 Current Population Surveys, unadjusted earnings are highest in the private nonprofit sector and lowest in private for-profit firms. Once measurable characteristics are accounted for, health practitioners in for-profit and nonprofit hospitals earn similar wages while public sector workers earn small but significant wage penalties. Nonpr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the Current Population Survey (CPS) Outgoing Rotation Groups, Ruhm and Borkoski (2003) find that nursing and personal care workers who switch sectors (while presumably maintaining their same altruism and quality levels) see approximately the same pay effects as their cross-sectional analyses of the broader CPS predict. Using more recent years of the same data source, Schumacher (2009) gets approximately the same result, suggesting that selection effects are minor in sectoral differences in pay for nurses. Byrne (2014) argues that the large proportion of nonprofit hospitals with religious affiliations enables him to account for self-selection, as those will attract more religious employees with altruistic motives.…”
Section: Selection Into Nonprofit Hospitalsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using the Current Population Survey (CPS) Outgoing Rotation Groups, Ruhm and Borkoski (2003) find that nursing and personal care workers who switch sectors (while presumably maintaining their same altruism and quality levels) see approximately the same pay effects as their cross-sectional analyses of the broader CPS predict. Using more recent years of the same data source, Schumacher (2009) gets approximately the same result, suggesting that selection effects are minor in sectoral differences in pay for nurses. Byrne (2014) argues that the large proportion of nonprofit hospitals with religious affiliations enables him to account for self-selection, as those will attract more religious employees with altruistic motives.…”
Section: Selection Into Nonprofit Hospitalsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This increases nonprofit managers' discretion, which they can use to increase compensation for themselves and others. Nonprofits' tax exemptions may also lower their costs enough to allow them to afford higher quality employees (Schumacher, 2009). If education and experience do not fully capture these higher skills, empirical studies might mistakenly find a wage premium (Byrne, 2014).…”
Section: Does the Nonprofit Sector Pay Differently?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bowman (2010) argues that another form of P-J fit-needs-supply-is a major driving force for lacking recruitment, suggesting that many students do not see fundraising as a viable career path, largely borne from a belief that working at a nonprofit necessarily means unsustainably low salaries. Evidence is mixed regarding wage differentials between nonprofit and for-profit professionals (Bishow & Monaco, 2016;Borkoski & Ruhm, 2016;Handy & Katz, 1998;Handy, Mook, Ginieniewicz, & Quarter, 2007;Leete, 2002;Schumacher, 2009), but fundraisers are often among the highest-paid nonprofit employees and among the highest-paid administrative staff at universities (Lindahl & Conley, 2002;Mesch & Rooney, 2008). In 2016, the average salary of all fundraisers (not just those in higher education) was $70,256 (Association of Fundraising Professionals, 2017).…”
Section: Fundraiser P-j Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we bear in mind that in Spain tuition fees are very similar in both degrees (per academic year), the individual's decision at age eighteen, in the context of the human capital theory (Becker 1964), will be affected by the net benefits of the investment in three extra years of university education. Despite the economic returns to higher education in these fields of study are well established (Wilson 1987;Elliott 2003;Galarneau 2004;Schumacher 2009), the economic advantages of graduates in Medicine relative to graduates in Nursing have not been explored empirically in Spain yet. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to study wage differentials among health professionals-a wage premium for doctors describes the percentage difference between that occupation's wage rate and the rate for nurses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%