2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Prior Abdominal Surgery Influence Outcomes or Complications of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
15
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
15
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to LRP and RARP, there was no significant difference between patients with and without a history of abdominal surgery . In the present study, the influence of prior abdominal surgery was consistent with that in most other current reports with respect to total operative time, robotic console time, complications and positive surgical margins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…With respect to LRP and RARP, there was no significant difference between patients with and without a history of abdominal surgery . In the present study, the influence of prior abdominal surgery was consistent with that in most other current reports with respect to total operative time, robotic console time, complications and positive surgical margins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The frequency of PSM in any series is influenced by surgical technique (procedure, neurovascular preservation, ability, and experience), tumor features (size, aggressiveness, extension), patient factors (BMI, prostate volume), and pathological analysis 15. We reviewed 22 studies of RALP with more than 500 cases reporting PSM ( Table 6 ) 7816171819202122232425262728293031323334353637. These studies assessed patients with the following clinical characteristics: PSA, 4.4–9.7 ng ml –1 ; clinical stage T1, 63.2%–90.0%; cT3, 0%–3%; high-risk patients, and 8.2%–12.0%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our PSM rate for pT2 (15.5%), pT3 (41.0%), and pT4 (95.8%) patients was within the range of those from other studies around the world ( Table 6 ). We reviewed nine studies of RARP for which more than 500 cases reported BCR ( Table 7 ) 72021222324293435363839. The clinical characteristics of these cohorts included PSA 4.4–9.7 ng ml –1 , 69.5%–88.0% of clinical stage T1, 12.0%–29.2% of T2, 0%–2.4% of T3, and about 11% high-risk patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfusion rates are lower and return to normal activity is shorter in RARP (5,16,20). In addition, complex situations like salvage RP or a history of rectum extirpation are no longer a contraindication for RARP (11,18). In the future the development of new instruments and the possibility of the use of simultaneous imaging will lead to more possibilities and maybe also to better results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%