1999
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does pay for performance increase or decrease perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation?

Abstract: Laboratory and field studies examined the relationships of reward for high performance with perceived self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Study 1 found that pay for meeting a performance standard had positive effects on college students' perceived self-determination and competence, expressed task enjoyment, and free time spent performing the task. Furthermore, reward's incremental effect on expressed task enjoyment was mediated by perceived self-determination and competence. Study 2 established that p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
282
2
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
18
282
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, organizational practices such as participation in decision making (Allen, Shore & Griffeth, 2003), fairness of rewards (Allen et al, 2003), developmental experiences and promotions (Wayne, Shore & Liden, 1997), autonomy (Eisenberger, Rhoades & Cameron, 1999) and job security (Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002) Organizational support theory suggests that high levels of perceived organizational support obliges employees to reciprocate, based on the norm of reciprocity. Greenberg (1980) argues that individuals reduce feelings of indebtedness upon receiving rewards by engaging in behavioral reciprocation and by cognitively restructuring the situation.…”
Section: Relating Pos and The Components Of Psychological Contract Fumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, organizational practices such as participation in decision making (Allen, Shore & Griffeth, 2003), fairness of rewards (Allen et al, 2003), developmental experiences and promotions (Wayne, Shore & Liden, 1997), autonomy (Eisenberger, Rhoades & Cameron, 1999) and job security (Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002) Organizational support theory suggests that high levels of perceived organizational support obliges employees to reciprocate, based on the norm of reciprocity. Greenberg (1980) argues that individuals reduce feelings of indebtedness upon receiving rewards by engaging in behavioral reciprocation and by cognitively restructuring the situation.…”
Section: Relating Pos and The Components Of Psychological Contract Fumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensions of POS have been established as follows: role clarity (Eisenberger, Rhoades & Cameron, 1999;Zapf, Knorz & Kulla, 1996), job information (Schat & Kelloway, 2003), participation in decision-making (Allen, Shore & Griffeth, 2003), support from co-workers (Djurkovic, McCormick & Casimir, 2004), supervisory support (Settoon, Bennett & Liden, 1996), which leads to increased job satisfaction (Eisenberger, Cummings, Armeli & Lynch, 1997), performance (Shanock & Eisenberger, 2006), commitment (Hochwarter, Kacmar, Perrewe & Johnson, 2003) and reduced turnover (Allen et al, 2003;Rhoades & Eisenberger, 2002).…”
Section: Bullying and Perceived Organisational Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Murphy and Dacin (1998); "trade contest is an important tool to motivate sales people to achieve goals that surpass those associated with normal compensation" while Beltramini and Kenneth (1998) argued that "contest enhances overall job satisfaction" it also increases corporate profit (Wildt, et al, 1987) and can be very successful (Eisenberger and Cameron, 1999). Contest is generally used to support the brands sales force performance; because effective selling and sales management are often critical to marketing success (Avlonitis and Panagopoulous, 2006;Defloor, et al, 2006;Zeb-Obipi, 2007;Dixon, et al, 2003;Jolson, 1999;Kelly, 1973).…”
Section: Trade Contestmentioning
confidence: 99%