2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does parasitoid state affect host range expression?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on physiological host range (ability to successfully develop in a host) is ideally accompanied by knowledge of ecological (realized) host range and parasitoid behavior, because maximumchallenge laboratory conditions often overestimate the likely impact and host range in the field (e.g., Haye et al 2005, Jenner et al 2014. Given that hundreds of pentatomid species occur in the U.S., some of which are predatory species, extensive host range testing of Asian Trissolcus, including T. japonicus, as candidate agents for H. halys has been in progress but is not yet completed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on physiological host range (ability to successfully develop in a host) is ideally accompanied by knowledge of ecological (realized) host range and parasitoid behavior, because maximumchallenge laboratory conditions often overestimate the likely impact and host range in the field (e.g., Haye et al 2005, Jenner et al 2014. Given that hundreds of pentatomid species occur in the U.S., some of which are predatory species, extensive host range testing of Asian Trissolcus, including T. japonicus, as candidate agents for H. halys has been in progress but is not yet completed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the knowledge that both D. pulchellus (Jenner et al, ) and C. albifrons (Arthur, ; Miall et al, ) require non‐host food sources to maximize their ability as primary (i.e., D. pulchellus & C. albifrons ) and secondary (i.e., C. albifrons ) parasitoids, we predicted that parasitoids provided with sucrose, floral nectar and extrafloral nectar resources would live longer, produce more offspring and kill more hosts than those provided only with water, hosts and the crop plant. Previously observed differences in life‐history traits of the two parasitoids (Jenner, Kuhlmann, Miall, Cappuccino, & Mason, ; Miall et al, ; Noyes, ) indicated that there could be different temporal effects of sugar provisioning on D. pulchellus and C. albifrons . Thus, we examined only the direct advantages of flowering plant and sugar provision on each of these parasitoids, a first step to understanding how this floral addition could affect the biological control effects of these parasitoids in a more complex ecological system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several biological attributes affect the potential effectiveness of parasitoids, such as development rate (Bürgi & Mills, 2013), larval survival (Qiu, Zhou, Luo & Xu, 2012), adult longevity (Winkler, Wäckers, Bukovinszkine-Kiss & Van Lenteren, 2006), sex ratio (Berndt & Wratten, 2005), fecundity (Jervis, Moe & Heimpel, 2012;Wakefield, Bell & Gatehouse, 2010), host specificity (Jenner, Kuhlmann, Miall, Cappuccino & Mason, 2014;Murray, Withers & Mansfield, 2010), and functional response (Latham & Mills, 2012;Luo, Li, Lu, Zhang, Haye, Kuhlmann & Wu, 2014b). The evaluation of a biological control agent requires the collection of detailed A c c e p t e d M a n u s c r i p t information on its life history traits, including aspects of immature stage development and the female's reproductive strategy (Haye, Broadbent, Whistlecraft, & Kuhlmann, 2005;Jervis et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%