Does outcome quality matter? An investigation in the context of banking services in an emerging market

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to measure outcome quality in banks in India and to make a comparative assessment of its influence on customer service quality perceptions. Though both functional quality (i.e. how service is delivered) and outcome quality (i.e. what is delivered) are important aspects of service quality, it is the functional quality which has primarily been the focus of past studies. Design/methodology/approach – The data used in the study are based on a survey of bank customers located in Delhi and National Capital Region. Using the exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, validity and dimensionality of the multi-item functional and outcome quality scales used in the study were assessed. A structural model of relationships of functional and outcome quality with overall service quality was tested through use of the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. Findings – The study finds outcome quality as being a significant and major determinant of customer service quality perceptions in banks. Inclusion of outcome quality in the analysis is, moreover, found to be helpful in capturing more exhaustively the variations present in customer overall service quality perceptions. Research limitations/implications – Both the functional and outcome quality in the study have been measured through scales adapted from past studies. But the same have not been found able to fully capture variations in customer service quality perceptions. More psychometrically sound scales to measure functional and outcome quality are needed. Studies in both the developing and developed countries and additional service sectors are called for to increase the generalizability of the study findings. Furthermore, nomological validity of the outcome quality scale needs to be investigated by relating it with other anent constructs, such as customer satisfaction and their behavioral intentions. Practical implications – Instead of simply remaining preoccupied with functional quality, i.e. process or how part of service delivery, bank management also needs to gauze customer outcome quality perceptions (i.e. what the customers think they are eventually getting out of their transactions with the service provider) and exercise due care to see that customers in fact are getting the core banking tasks performed for which they approach the banks in the first instance. Originality/value – Present study is first of its kind in investigating role of outcome quality in banking services sector in the context of an emerging market like India. Use of SEM for analyzing both the measurement and structural models constitutes another noteworthy feature of the study.

Customer value co-creation and new service evaluation: the moderating role of outcome quality

“…Previous studies on consumers’ service evaluations have demonstrated the significant interactive effects of process and outcome quality (Hui et al ., 2004; Jain and Jain, 2015; Yang et al ., 2012). However, this study’s findings have broader implications, revealing direct interactions of consumers’ service co-creation behaviors with outcome quality.…”

“…Both the service consumption process and the consumption outcome influence the evaluations of service experience (Hui et al , 2004; Jain and Jain, 2015; Yang et al , 2012). For example, within the literature on particular types of innovation, some studies on self-service technologies found that outcomes such as reduced waiting times enhance customer satisfaction (Weijters et al , 2007), whereas others emphasized processual effects, arguing that customers’ evaluations of technology-infused services can change from positive to negative according to the degree of their rapport with employees (Giebelhausen et al , 2014).…”

Service Quality of Islamic Banks: A Cultural Perspective

“…This is supported by Shariff (2013) who said that the effort of doing things perfectly is a type of worship, and as such Islamic bank should provide good service quality as it is line with the bank principle. In the context of a bank in general, service quality is known as a vital and essential value, as banks that offer a distinguished level of service have a higher competitive edge (Jain & Jain, 2015). Therefore, providing high service quality is considered critical for enhancing long-term relationships with customers, especially in the competitive business environment of modern banking (Camarero, 2007;Hawke & Heffernan, 2006).…”

“…Maintaining a high standard of quality is essential in producing products and delivering services. In the context of service industry such as banks, providing a distinguished level of service quality leads to a higher competitive edge (Jain & Jain, 2015). This applies not only to conventional banks but also to the Islamic bank.…”

The Oscars: Friends and foes for millennials

“…This study uses a multi‐method approach to formulate a theoretical framework of movie service and experience evaluation based on Millennials' perceived quality of the Academy Awards and their relevancy concerning movie characteristics, social media usage, and eWOM. The paper is based on a conceptual framework that theorizes movies as experiences (Hofmann et al, 2017) and incorporates the service quality framework (Jain & Jain, 2015; Parasuraman et al, 1988; Zhuang et al, 2014). We also consider generational cohort theory as a consumer segmentation approach based on similar values and attitudes (Eastman et al, 2021).…”