2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-020-00984-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does organizational reciprocity improve employees’ motivation? The mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a comprehensive account of how need satisfaction is understood by Chinese working adults today has been under-researched. We identified that most Chinese researchers measure need satisfaction using Maslow's (1943) hierarchy of needs;McClelland's (1965) research on achievement, affiliation, and power needs; and Deci and Ryan's (2000) self-determination needs, similar to other countries (e.g., Chen et al, 2015;Lin & Chan, 2020;Liu et al, 2020;M. Tang et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Psychology Of Working Theory and Work Need Satisfaction In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a comprehensive account of how need satisfaction is understood by Chinese working adults today has been under-researched. We identified that most Chinese researchers measure need satisfaction using Maslow's (1943) hierarchy of needs;McClelland's (1965) research on achievement, affiliation, and power needs; and Deci and Ryan's (2000) self-determination needs, similar to other countries (e.g., Chen et al, 2015;Lin & Chan, 2020;Liu et al, 2020;M. Tang et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Psychology Of Working Theory and Work Need Satisfaction In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, it suggests that the PA practices at the MoE should not only enhance the productivity and performance of the employees Kuvaas, (2006) in Liu et al, (2020) but well-designed PA system may also gain commitment of the employees and may positively affect their attitudes and behaviour. It is further supported empirically that there is a significant relationship effect between PA practices and organizational commitment and employee attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, psychological contracts act as a framework, explaining relationships between employee and employer and then explaining the fulfillment or breach of the contracts between employee and employer (Robinson & Rousseau, 1994;Shore & Tetrick, 1994). Secondly, the contemporary social exchange theory emphasizes the operationalization of social exchange as a form of interpersonal relationship by postulating a valid mediator to explain the relationship between justice and employee outcomes (Colquitt et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2020). Psychological contracts are critical to this relationship because they rationalize the terms of the exchange relationship from the employee's point of view (López Bohle et al, 2017).…”
Section: Psychological Contract Breach As a Mediator Between Organiza...mentioning
confidence: 99%