Does Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Minimize Surgical Site Infections?

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective review of prospectively collected data.PurposeTo evaluate the incidence of surgical site infections (SSIs) in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) in a cohort of patients and compare with available historical data on SSI in open spinal surgery cohorts, and to evaluate additional direct costs incurred due to SSI.Overview of LiteratureSSI can lead to prolonged antibiotic therapy, extended hospitalization, repeated operations, and implant removal. Small incisions and minimal dissection intrinsic to MISS may minimize the risk of postoperative infections. However, there is a dearth of literature on infections after MISS and their additional direct financial implications.MethodsAll patients from January 2007 to January 2015 undergoing posterior spinal surgery with tubular retractor system and microscope in our institution were included. The procedures performed included tubular discectomies, tubular decompressions for spinal stenosis and minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The incidence of postoperative SSI was calculated and compared to the range of cited SSI rates from published studies. Direct costs were calculated from medical billing for index cases and for patients with SSI.ResultsA total of 1,043 patients underwent 763 noninstrumented surgeries (discectomies, decompressions) and 280 instrumented (TLIF) procedures. The mean age was 52.2 years with male:female ratio of 1.08:1. Three infections were encountered with fusion surgeries (mean detection time, 7 days). All three required wound wash and debridement with one patient requiring unilateral implant removal. Additional direct cost due to infection was $2,678 per 100 MISS-TLIF. SSI increased hospital expenditure per patient 1.5-fold after instrumented MISS.ConclusionsOverall infection rate after MISS was 0.29%, with SSI rate of 0% in non-instrumented MISS and 1.07% with instrumented MISS. MISS can markedly reduce the SSI rate and can be an effective tool to minimize hospital costs.

Does Spondylodiscitis Follow All Its Parameters? - Report of Three Atypical Cases

“…Most common organism encountered in postoperative spine infection was S. aureus. There was a report of accidental penetration of guide wire beyond anterior vertebral wall into the abdomen, which was retrieved successfully but caused a Klebsiella pneumoniae infection post operatively [26] . There was a report where after a complex gastrointestinal surgery developed cervical epidural abscess.…”

A systematic review on prevention and management of wound infections from cochlear implantation

“…It is now common practice that smaller incisions are employed to minimise flap failures and breakdown; however, a correlation with wound infection has not been studied. Despite the lack of evidence, common sense would dictate that a smaller incision would provide a lesser raw surface area for microorganisms to grow in, reducing surgical site infection 22,23 while also minimising postoperative pain morbidity. The recommendations for skin prep, device preparation and placement, method of wound closure and postoperative dressings were generally based on single-centre experience and thus difficult to support.…”

Disc Replacement in Lumbar Spine

“…They can lead to prolonged antibiotic therapy, prolonged hospitalization, repeated operations, and implant removal. 12 In 2016, a literature review evaluated the incidence of surgical infections in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). Data from all patients who visited the hospital service between January 2007 and January 2017 and who underwent posterior spine surgery with a tubular retractor system and microscope were analyzed.…”