2004
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00410.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does menarche mark a period of elevated resting metabolic rate?

Abstract: ; 10.1152/ ajpendo.00410.2003.-Resting metabolic rate (RMR) and body composition were measured in 44 initially nonoverweight girls at three time points relative to menarche: premenarche (Tanner stage 1 or 2), menarche (Ϯ6 mo), and 4 yr after menarche. Mean absolute RMR was 1,167, 1,418, and 1,347 kcal/day, respectively. Absolute RMR was statistically significantly higher at menarche than at 4 yr after menarche despite statistically significantly less fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM), suggesting an elevati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies of RMR in non‐obese children of similar ages to the present study have been completed with subjects measured lying and the RMR values have ranged between 1012±105 and 1420±157 (kcal/day) 36–40, and in a seated position the RMR values ranged between 1133±241 and 1358±280 (kcal/day) 9, 27, 28. It is this wide variability among different studies that prompted the main focus of this study, which was to investigate the lack of comparability using different methodological approaches for RMR measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Numerous studies of RMR in non‐obese children of similar ages to the present study have been completed with subjects measured lying and the RMR values have ranged between 1012±105 and 1420±157 (kcal/day) 36–40, and in a seated position the RMR values ranged between 1133±241 and 1358±280 (kcal/day) 9, 27, 28. It is this wide variability among different studies that prompted the main focus of this study, which was to investigate the lack of comparability using different methodological approaches for RMR measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Because RMR adjusted for body composition appears to be lower in black than in white girls (2, 25, 32-34), we evaluated a race ҂ visit interaction term to assess any racial differences in the changes that occur in TEE and its components with age. In addition, we tested a parental overweight ҂ visit interaction term in all adjusted analyses because we previously observed in another subgroup of girls a significant parental overweight ҂ visit interaction in RMR evaluated before menarche (baseline), at menarche, and 4 y after menarche (31). We also determined the significance of changes with age in absolute FFM, FM, PAL, and time spent sleeping, being sedentary, and in moderate and vigorous activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few longitudinal studies have published data on changes in TEE, RMR, or AEE (or all) in children (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)31). One study was restricted to boys (4).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some studies have used large sample sizes (Hosking et al, ; Lazzer et al, ; Schofield, ; Zakeri et al, ), the majority of studies have been completed on relatively small numbers of subject (<100) and incorporated wide age ranges (Bandini et al, ; Buchowski et al, ; Dugas et al, ; Goran et al, ; Rush et al, ; Spadano et al, ; Trowbridge et al, ; Zemel et al, ), such that differences between 8 and 15 year olds were not taken into consideration. Therefore, there is a need for a comprehensive examination of the existing literature to determine the combined effect of age, sex, and anthropometric characteristics on youth REE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%