2011
DOI: 10.1002/pa.410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does market volatility impact presidential approval?

Abstract: Recently, market volatility has been used as an explanatory variable for presidential job approval. Our research builds on such an approach by first extracting the economic and non-economic components of market volatility using the Eta W (c4cast.com, Inc., 750 E. Walnut St., Pasadena, CA 91101) model, which considers 18 economic factors, far more than the unemployment and inflation factors used in most similar studies. Further, our results suggest that it is not aggregated market volatility but rather disaggre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, analyses that examine mean levels of political attitudes as a function of economic volatility have generally found a positive relationship between the two. In particular, these studies reveal that increasing volatility in the stock market is associated with increased presidential approval (Schwartz, Hoover, and Schwartz 2008;Chong, Halcoussis, and Phillips 2011). The "basic idea is simply that in times of uncertainty, people act to support the President," akin to a rally round the flag effect (Schwartz et al 2008, 200).…”
Section: Beyond the Mean: Incorporating Volatility Into Models Of Ecomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, analyses that examine mean levels of political attitudes as a function of economic volatility have generally found a positive relationship between the two. In particular, these studies reveal that increasing volatility in the stock market is associated with increased presidential approval (Schwartz, Hoover, and Schwartz 2008;Chong, Halcoussis, and Phillips 2011). The "basic idea is simply that in times of uncertainty, people act to support the President," akin to a rally round the flag effect (Schwartz et al 2008, 200).…”
Section: Beyond the Mean: Incorporating Volatility Into Models Of Ecomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show that, standard linear Granger causality test fail to detect any predictability emanating from presidential approval ratings to stock returns. Figure 2 Time-varying Granger causality between realized volatility and presidential approval ratings See notes for Figure 1. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] 9 The ability of stock market volatility, as measured by the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX), in predicting presidential approval ratings has also been confirmed by Schwartz et al (2008) and Chong et al (2011). 10 Giot et al (2010) points out that market participants care not only about the nature of volatility, but also of its level, with all traders making the distinction between good and bad volatilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of stock market volatility, as measured by the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX), in predicting presidential approval ratings has also been confirmed by Schwartz et al (2008) and Chong et al (2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use a newspaper-based measure of uncertainty among the literature on economic voting and the determinants of presidential popularity. The few existing studies focussing on this relationship either use stock market volatility [ 32 , 33 ] or GDP growth volatility [ 34 ] as proxies for uncertainty. It is noteworthy that our main result is not explained by proxies for the economic outllok, indicating that there is a difference between the economic uncertainty channel and the more traditional economic outlook channel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%