2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.japwor.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Korea follow Japan in foreign aid? Relationships between aid and foreign investment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the Kimura and Todo (2010) study, Kang et al (2011) provides a micro level analysis as to how foreign aid is related to FDI by two countries -Korea and Japan. As with the previous studies, this study did not reveal a strong relationship between foreign aid and FDI.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar to the Kimura and Todo (2010) study, Kang et al (2011) provides a micro level analysis as to how foreign aid is related to FDI by two countries -Korea and Japan. As with the previous studies, this study did not reveal a strong relationship between foreign aid and FDI.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When foreign firms are contracted to implement aid projects, they may gain information on the operational environment and learn about conducting business in a particular setting. This effect has been found for both Japanese and Korean aid projects (Blaise, 2005;Kimura & Todo, 2010;Kang, Lee, & Park, 2011). Moreover, successful implementation of a donor-funded project can provide a signal to private investors about the commitment of local governments to expedient permitting, enforcement of contracts, and timely co-financing or subsidy arrangements, potentially alleviating risks to projects that involve foreign participants (Bayer, Dolan, & Urpelainen, 2013;Bayer, Marcoux, & Urpelainen, 2013).…”
Section: General Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…32, 164À165). According to an analysis by Kan, Lee, and Park (2011), among DAC countries, it is only South Korea and Japan whose aid has a statistically significant correlation with the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) to the aid recipient countries. Despite the good will of Kan, Lee and Park in demonstrating some common positive characteristics of Japanese and Korean ODA, close linkage between ODA and FDI would be rather a source of criticism from DAC members for tying the aid with the commercial interests of donor countries.…”
Section: Elements Of the So-called Korean Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%