Does Interdisciplinarity Exist Behind the Façade of Traditional Disciplines? A Study of Natural Resource Management Teaching

Abstract

We investigated the hypothesis that interdisciplinarity is being explicitly taught behind the façade of traditional disciplines. We interviewed 14 academics (seven geographers and seven agricultural scientists) about their teaching in the inherently interdisciplinary field of natural resource management. Our teachers were generally well informed about interdisciplinarity, believed it is important in a natural resource management degree, and participants viewed the traditional discipline-based structure as a major obstacle to collaboration, mostly because of competition between disciplines for student income. Other barriers included the strong rewards of disciplinary specialization, the difficulty of sustaining teaching teams, and other university structures, such as inflexible timetables. We suggest that if institutions with traditional disciplinebased structures want to provide students with interdisciplinary opportunities, teachers need to be adequately supported in terms of workload, career rewards and pedagogy.

Percepciones de directivos y profesorado de educación física sobre las competencias básicas

“…Para contribuir a las CCBB, además de tener un conocimiento y manejo exhaustivo de los elementos curriculares, se hacen fundamentales la organización y el funcionamiento de los centros, la participación del alumnado en los proyectos y una estructura de actuación común (Pharo y Bridle, 2012). Sin embargo, existen otros factores asociados y no menos importantes como el uso que se haga de la acción tutorial, el funcionamiento de la biblioteca, la relación con los padres y la planificación de actividades complementarias y extraescolares.…”

Using communities of practice to enhance interdisciplinary teaching: lessons from four Australian institutions

“…Substantive barriers include colleagues from different disciplines having limited common ground in terms of shared language and professional norms. Procedural barriers include the administrative marginalisation of teaching collaboration between disciplinary units through workload allocation and budget disincentives (Kember, 2009;Pharo & Bridle, 2012;Russell, Wickson, & Carew, 2008). University teaching has long been regarded as a highly individualised practice (Ortquist-Ahrens & Torosyan, 2008), in contrast to the collaborative nature of many research practices that involve working directly with peers to solve problems, identify shared goals, and exchange different perspectives and experiences (Ǻkerlind, 2011).…”

“…Responding to climate change complexity' (Davison et al, 2012). It built on a successful 2008 pilot project at UTas (Pharo et al 2012).…”

¿Cómo Perciben las Competencias Básicas los Docentes? Estudio Cualitativo sobre su Incorporación como Herramienta de Aprendizaje

“…En relación con el tipo de estrategias que pueden utilizarse para contribuir a las competencias, Pharo andBridle (2012) y Pepper (2011) establecen que las tareas no tienen que centrarse únicamente en conocimientos que se impartan en el aula y que no tengan ningún tipo de vinculación con lo que se realice fuera de la misma, sino que deben conseguir que motiven al alumnado para indagar, buscar, reflexionar… En este sentido, es muy recomendable que se realicen diferentes proyectos que involucren a las familias, personal de bibliotecas y a otros agentes de la comunidad educativa en la realización de actividades complementarias y extraescolares.…”