“…Even more interesting, Alesina and Tabellini (1987), Obstfeld (1991), Jensen (1994), Van der Ploeg (1995), Van Arle et al (1995) and Minea et al (2011) agree on the fact that if the central bank decides to grant significant weight in its loss function to the price stability objective, it will reduce seigniorage revenue and compel the State to increase tax revenues through tax mobilization effort. Otherwise, valuable theoretical studies (see, e.g., Bernanke and Mishkin, 1997;Svensson, 1997;Bernanke et al, 1999) were motivated by the common finding in many empirical studies (see, e.g., Goncalves and Salles, 2008;Lin and Ye, 2009), for, the inflation targeting (thereafter IT) policy has helped emerging inflation targeters to have a significant improvement in macroeconomic performance which is mainly measured through the behavior of inflation, output and interest rates. But, this monetary strategy requiresa process of economic and institutional reforms which have a relatively large disciplining effect on the conduct of fiscal policy in avoiding seigniorage revenue and therefore opting for a tax mobilization/government expenditure rationalisation and public deficit reduction.…”