2020
DOI: 10.2399/prn.20.0282015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does fetal MR alter the management of pregnancy in the diagnosis of isolated corpus callosum agenesis?

Abstract: Objective To determine if fetal MR alters the management of pregnancy and family decisions in the isolated corpus callosum agenesis (CCA) cases or not. Methods Fetal MR was carried out in the cases diagnosed with CCA in the Perinatology Unit of our hospital between 2013 and 2019 after they were differentiated as complex and isolated CCA cases. The impact of MR results on the family decisions and their approaches towards termination were assessed. Results A total of 109 out 139 cases were evaluated as isolate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Callosal abnormalities have been described in various congenital metabolic diseases, chromosomal abnormalities, and syndromes. [2][3][4][5] Probable CC abnormalities include complete or partial agenesis, an increased (hyperplasia) or reduced thickness (hypoplasia), or an abnormal configuration (dysgenesis/dysplasia). 6 The exact incidence of agenesis of CC is difficult to estimate because the reported data usually include case series from tertiary referral centers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Callosal abnormalities have been described in various congenital metabolic diseases, chromosomal abnormalities, and syndromes. [2][3][4][5] Probable CC abnormalities include complete or partial agenesis, an increased (hyperplasia) or reduced thickness (hypoplasia), or an abnormal configuration (dysgenesis/dysplasia). 6 The exact incidence of agenesis of CC is difficult to estimate because the reported data usually include case series from tertiary referral centers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%