2017
DOI: 10.22161/ijeab/2.2.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does fertilization practices increase residual nitrate nitrogen in soil irrigated with treated wastewater? An experimental trial on maize

Abstract: Abstract-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding irrigation scheduling, the ongoing proposed strategies for TWW reuse continue to rely on the traditional modeling of irrigation plans that are intended for conventional water sources. They are mostly based on the evapotranspiration demand, which means that the delivered water to the crops is obtained as the difference between seasonal evapotranspiration and precipitation deficit (Lonigro et al 2015; Khelil et al 2017; Libutti et al 2018). Traditional irrigation plans can also be based on the soil water depletion ratio, as irrigation occurs whenever the soil water deficit in the effective root zone reaches a predefined limit value of the total available water (TAW) (Allen et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding irrigation scheduling, the ongoing proposed strategies for TWW reuse continue to rely on the traditional modeling of irrigation plans that are intended for conventional water sources. They are mostly based on the evapotranspiration demand, which means that the delivered water to the crops is obtained as the difference between seasonal evapotranspiration and precipitation deficit (Lonigro et al 2015; Khelil et al 2017; Libutti et al 2018). Traditional irrigation plans can also be based on the soil water depletion ratio, as irrigation occurs whenever the soil water deficit in the effective root zone reaches a predefined limit value of the total available water (TAW) (Allen et al 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%