2006
DOI: 10.1177/0007650305283332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Female Representation on Boards of Directors Associate With Fortune's “100 Best Companies to Work For” List?

Abstract: This study examines the influence of women in business using a sample of firms on Fortune's “100 Best Companies to Work For” list and is an extension of Bernardi et al.'s work. We use the data from Bernardi et al. to determine whether a higher representation of women on a board signals an increased commitment of a firm to a quality environment and employment characteristics necessary to establish the firm on Fortune's “100 Best Companies to Work For” list. Our findings include a significant increase in the num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
139
1
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(31 reference statements)
6
139
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has related women's involvement in governance to financial measures such as profitability and value in the UK (Singh et al, 2001) or the US (Carter et al,, 2003;Erhardt et al,2003). Further research has examined the effect on reputation (Bernardi et al, 2006), and strategic, corporate or market positioning (Shrader et al,1997). Although the positive effect is usually assumed, empirical evidence suggest the diversity of organisations needs to be considered.…”
Section: Women and Organisational Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has related women's involvement in governance to financial measures such as profitability and value in the UK (Singh et al, 2001) or the US (Carter et al,, 2003;Erhardt et al,2003). Further research has examined the effect on reputation (Bernardi et al, 2006), and strategic, corporate or market positioning (Shrader et al,1997). Although the positive effect is usually assumed, empirical evidence suggest the diversity of organisations needs to be considered.…”
Section: Women and Organisational Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this often represents a misalignment between words and actions (a diversity mixed message) because the majority of organizations are still male dominated, especially in boardrooms, where female representation rarely overcomes token status (Bernardi, Bosco, & Vassill, 2006; 4 We exploratively found an interaction between board type and participants' gender. Whereas the link between the number of women on the board and integrity perceptions was almost linear for men, there was a clear kink for women.…”
Section: Main Contributions and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Finally, this study was conducted in Germany. Although Germany shares various elements regarding organizational gender diversity (e.g., male dominance in upper echelons, high public scrutiny of the issue, and some sort of regulation) with other countries (Bernardi et al, 2006;Catalyst, 2013;German Ministry of Family Affairs, 2014;Pande & Ford, 2011;Vinnicombe et al, 2014), similar research in other societal contexts and countries is needed. In countries with strong gender egalitarianism, for instance, it is likely that the effects of diversity mixed messages might be stronger.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons to believe that boards that include a greater proportion of women are better. For example, these companies could deal more effectively with diversity related to products and markets and also improve their overall image as a result of an improvement of the ethical decision process (Bernardi et al, 2006). So far, the empirical studies that have addressed this relation have offered mixed results.…”
Section: Board Attributes and Company Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean proportion of females within Romanian boards is 13.50%; this might look like a small percentage, but in fact it is comparable to other results of female representation. For example, the study performed by Bernardi et al (2006) upon boards of directors associated with Fortune's "100 Best Companies to Work For" revealed a female representation of 12.00%. The mean proportion of outside directors is 84%, which is similar to the proportion of boards in Australia (Stapledon and Lawrence, 1996) or even in the United States (Bhagat and Black, 2002).…”
Section: Empirical Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%