Does Competition Really Bring Out the Worst? Testosterone, Social Distance and Inter-Male Competition Shape Parochial Altruism in Human Males

Abstract

Parochial altruism, defined as increased ingroup favoritism and heightened outgroup hostility, is a widespread feature of human societies that affects altruistic cooperation and punishment behavior, particularly in intergroup conflicts. Humans tend to protect fellow group members and fight against outsiders, even at substantial costs for themselves. Testosterone modulates responses to competition and social threat, but its exact role in the context of parochial altruism remains controversial. Here, we investigated how testosterone influences altruistic punishment tendencies in the presence of an intergroup competition. Fifty male soccer fans played an ultimatum game (UG), in which they faced anonymous proposers that could either be a fan of the same soccer team (ingroup) or were fans of other teams (outgroups) that differed in the degree of social distance and enmity to the ingroup. The UG was played in two contexts with varying degrees of intergroup rivalry. Our data show that unfair offers were rejected more frequently than fair proposals and the frequency of altruistic punishment increased with increasing social distance to the outgroups. Adding an intergroup competition led to a further escalation of outgroup hostility and reduced punishment of unfair ingroup members. High testosterone levels were associated with a relatively increased ingroup favoritism and also a change towards enhanced outgroup hostility in the intergroup competition. High testosterone concentrations further predicted increased proposer generosity in interactions with the ingroup. Altogether, a significant relation between testosterone and parochial altruism could be demonstrated, but only in the presence of an intergroup competition. In human males, testosterone may promote group coherence in the face of external threat, even against the urge to selfishly maximize personal reward. In that way, our observation refutes the view that testosterone generally promotes antisocial behaviors and aggressive responses, but underlines its rather specific role in the fine-tuning of male social cognition.

Testosterone, Cortisol and Empathy: Evidence for the Dual-Hormone Hypothesis

“…in conjunction with high cortisol) testosterone might be associated with enhanced empathy is congruent with recent evidence showing that high exogenous and endogenous androgens may sometimes promote altruistic behavior (van Honk et al 2012;Diekhof et al 2014). For example, Diekhof and colleagues reported that in the context of between-group competition, high testosterone men not only favored outgroup hostility but also promoted ingroup prosocial behavior (Diekhof et al 2014).…”

Testosterone and reproductive effort in male primates

“…Recent human data suggest that testosterone might simultaneously promote in-group bonds while increasing between-group hostility (Diekhof et al 2014). Species exhibiting cooperative territorial behavior should provide opportunities for investigating this dynamic.…”

Endogenous Testosterone and Exogenous Oxytocin Modulate Attentional Processing of Infant Faces

“…Furthermore, testosterone promotes masculinization and correlates negatively with prosocial behaviors that are important for childrearing (e.g., nurturance and empathy) and maternal attributes [3,9,12] (but also see [16,17] for a different role of testosterone in male-male cooperation during intergroup conflict). During parenthood testosterone levels decrease, which could be an adaptation to facilitate parental investment [18,19].…”