2017
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does breech delivery in an upright position instead of on the back improve outcomes and avoid cesareans?

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(51 reference statements)
4
66
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The opposing belief among a portion of participants that identification of specialists would limit, rather than expand, availability of breech births requires careful consideration in any setting intending to trial a breech team. A further limitation is that the participants in the research were all oriented to physiological breech birth, involving upright maternal positioning . Although many of the participants developed experience within settings where this practice was not normative, the social clinical roles may not function in the same way in maternity care contexts where women and/or their attendants are not able to use upright birthing positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposing belief among a portion of participants that identification of specialists would limit, rather than expand, availability of breech births requires careful consideration in any setting intending to trial a breech team. A further limitation is that the participants in the research were all oriented to physiological breech birth, involving upright maternal positioning . Although many of the participants developed experience within settings where this practice was not normative, the social clinical roles may not function in the same way in maternity care contexts where women and/or their attendants are not able to use upright birthing positions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ausencia de estudios conclusivos, la posición materna puede ser de litotomía o vertical (5,6,26) y, dado que no existe evidencia suficiente, el refuerzo del trabajo de parto con oxitocina (5,6) puede ser una alternativa por considerar cuando la dinámica uterina no es apropiada (1,5,18,25). El Maternal Fetal Medicine Committee (MFMC) recomienda evitar la amniorrexis, ofrecer una alternativa para el manejo del dolor, efectuar vigilancia del bienestar fetal (25), así como de la adecuada progresión del parto (5,24).…”
Section: Manejo Intraparto De La Gestante Con Feto En Presentación Peunclassified
“…An upright position during the second stage of labor also decreases the episiotomy rate but appears to increase 2nd degree lacerations and postpartum hemorrhage . For vaginal breech delivery, the upright position also seems to be associated with a significant reduction in the episiotomy rate when compared with vaginal delivery in the dorsal position …”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…24 For vaginal breech delivery, the upright position also seems to be associated with a significant reduction in the episiotomy rate when compared with vaginal delivery in the dorsal position. 25 Given all available evidence, FIGO supports the restrictive use of episiotomy, where the procedure is limited to situations in which perineal laceration has already begun or there is an imminent threat of perineal tear or when there is urgency in delivering the fetus. Further research is needed to identify strategies that result in the reduction of episiotomies, as well as 3rd and 4th degree lacerations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%