The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing 2015
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107447257.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does bilingual exerciseenhance cognitive fitnessin traditional non-linguistic executive processing tasks?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
85
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Setting aside the discussed limitations of our study, the current results do not lend much support to the hypothesis that language switching improves executive functions in bilinguals. This is in line with a meticulously conducted review of 31 experiments by Hilchey and Klein (2011), which showed that the evidence that bilingualism boosts inhibitory skills is sporadic at best (see also the updated review by Hilchey, Saint-Aubin, & Klein, 2015). Whereas Hilchey and Klein (2011) examined only inhibition, Paap (2014) discusses the methodological shortcomings of studies concerning the facilitating effect of bilingualism on executive functions more generally.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Setting aside the discussed limitations of our study, the current results do not lend much support to the hypothesis that language switching improves executive functions in bilinguals. This is in line with a meticulously conducted review of 31 experiments by Hilchey and Klein (2011), which showed that the evidence that bilingualism boosts inhibitory skills is sporadic at best (see also the updated review by Hilchey, Saint-Aubin, & Klein, 2015). Whereas Hilchey and Klein (2011) examined only inhibition, Paap (2014) discusses the methodological shortcomings of studies concerning the facilitating effect of bilingualism on executive functions more generally.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In fact, we failed to find any signs of a bilingual advantage in samples of carefully selected lifelong non-immigrant native bilingual seniors with different degrees of proficiency that live in a bilingual society, when their performance is compared with that of a group of carefully matched monolingual seniors. Hence, we conclude that lifelong bilingualism does not represent any specific benefit in executive functions in healthy elderly (see also Hilchey, Saint-Aubin, & Klein, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…On average studies investigating young adults tested with simple executive function tasks often fail to discriminate between these groups, but the issue is how to interpret these results and what implications these null results have for the more robust effects of bilingualism found at other points in the lifespan and using different approaches, including neuroimaging, even with young adults. If it turns out that there is absolutely no trace of an effect of bilingualism on young adults as some have argued (e.g., Hilchey et al, 2015) one would still need to explain how an experience that impacts cognitive and brain structure in childhood and older age recedes in young adulthood where it appears to have no consequence. More importantly, the studies that do show language group differences on behavioral measures of executive function would still need to be explained.…”
Section: Evidence For Bilingual Effects On Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%