2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2797078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Banknote Quality Affect Counterfeit Detection? Experimental Evidence from Germany and the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, a public person receives few banknotes per day, maybe no more than one or two. He/she has poor qualitative knowledge of the security features [26], [27], but the time that he/she can spend for verification is relative high, e.g., 5 seconds [3].…”
Section: Application Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, a public person receives few banknotes per day, maybe no more than one or two. He/she has poor qualitative knowledge of the security features [26], [27], but the time that he/she can spend for verification is relative high, e.g., 5 seconds [3].…”
Section: Application Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if the detection of counterfeit banknotes requires the processing of specific details, we would expect that a longer exposure duration would greatly improve performance. As an upper limit we used an exposure duration of 10,000 ms, as it was previously shown that the hit rate in detecting a counterfeit does not increase beyond an exposure duration of ten seconds (Van der Horst et al, 2016).…”
Section: About Timementioning
confidence: 99%