2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a stable isotopically labeled internal standard always correct analyte response?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
137
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
137
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard addition [22], echo-peak technique [23,24], isotope dilution [25], post-column standard infusion [26], internal standard usage [27] and matrix-matched calibration [28] can be done to reduce the influence of matrix effect. However, this group of approaches is not immune to matrix effect when using ESI interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard addition [22], echo-peak technique [23,24], isotope dilution [25], post-column standard infusion [26], internal standard usage [27] and matrix-matched calibration [28] can be done to reduce the influence of matrix effect. However, this group of approaches is not immune to matrix effect when using ESI interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] Evaluations based on the relative signal intensities using internal standards, which are typically stable isotope-labeled analogues or compounds having similar structures to the analytes, are also effective in diminishing the matrix effect, 20,22,23 but this may not always be applicable. 29 Nevertheless, the matrix effect is strongly dependent on the chemical nature of each sample, so there is no universal approach that minimizes or overcomes the matrix effect.…”
Section: ·2 Effects Of the Matrix Effect And On-line Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the internal standard had to elute close to the compound of interest, showing similar behavior in the detector, in such a way that more than one of them should be used [77]. It is generally observed that using internal standards derives in significant enhancement of certain analytical figures of merit such as precision, linearity and accuracy.…”
Section: Variations In the Analytical Responsementioning
confidence: 99%