Methodologies in Semantic Fieldwork 2015
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.003.0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Documenting and Classifying Aspectual Classes Across Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, cross-linguistic studies (e.g. Ebert 1995;Bickel 1996Bickel , 1997Tatevosov 2002;Botne 2003), show that different languages can conceptualize nearest translational equivalents quite differently, and increasing evidence shows that in a number of languagesmaybe even the majority -Vendler's ontology is insufficient to capture significant properties of actional systems (see also Bar-el 2015).…”
Section: Actionality In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, cross-linguistic studies (e.g. Ebert 1995;Bickel 1996Bickel , 1997Tatevosov 2002;Botne 2003), show that different languages can conceptualize nearest translational equivalents quite differently, and increasing evidence shows that in a number of languagesmaybe even the majority -Vendler's ontology is insufficient to capture significant properties of actional systems (see also Bar-el 2015).…”
Section: Actionality In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the centrality of actionality, careful typological surveys of actional systems have been rare (but see e.g. Bar-el 2015;Bickel 1997;Nichols 2018;Van Valin 2006). As a result, our knowledge of the distributional typology of actionality systems is still fairly limited.…”
Section: Background and Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent literature on actionality from a cross-linguistic perspective, it has been pointed out that the phase structure, i.e. the temporal profile, of a particular state-of-affairs is language-specific (Tatevosov 2002: 324;Botne 2003b;Bar-el 2015). One case in point is the so-called "bi-phasal" (Ebert 1995), "ingressive-stative" (Bickel 1997: 124-127) or "inceptive-stative" (Tatevosov 2002: 382-384) phase structure, in which a transitional "entryinto-a-state" phase is part of (or "profiled in") the temporal structure.…”
Section: A (7)mentioning
confidence: 99%