2014
DOI: 10.15663/wje.v19i2.99
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Doctorates in the dark: Threshold concepts and the improvement of doctoral supervision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also wanted increased opportunities to assemble and write. Student reflections supported findings emerging from my two-year participation in a research project to examine threshold concepts in doctoral writing (Johnson, 2013(Johnson, , 2014b. Two key findings emerged from my case study -students did not possess deep conceptual understanding of what research 'writing' actually means, and they did not have an agentic view of themselves as scholars.…”
Section: Reassessing the Dwc Approachsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…They also wanted increased opportunities to assemble and write. Student reflections supported findings emerging from my two-year participation in a research project to examine threshold concepts in doctoral writing (Johnson, 2013(Johnson, , 2014b. Two key findings emerged from my case study -students did not possess deep conceptual understanding of what research 'writing' actually means, and they did not have an agentic view of themselves as scholars.…”
Section: Reassessing the Dwc Approachsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Hohepa (2010) takes this further and argues, "the work that supervisors do directly with their Māori doctoral students is still the most critical component in the process if students are to complete their study successfully" (p. 130). It is important to note that many supervision-related factors impact students completing their doctoral qualification (Hohepa, 2010;Johnson, 2014;Theodore et al, 2015). Some of these issues are related to quality supervision, the use of supervision models and the structural support systems needed for Māori and Pasifika postgraduate research students (Glynn & Berryman, 2015;Hohepa, 2010;McKinley & Grant, 2012).…”
Section: Background On Cross-cultural Supervision Of Māori Doctoral S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the traditional Australian honours/Masters Research pathway -and its scaffolded model of research training -is becoming no longer the norm (Hamilton et al, 2014), provision of research training for HDR candidates is perhaps more critical in Australia than in the USA. Moreover, not only has the number of HDR candidates increased, the cultural, linguistic, educational and professional profiles of candidates have also diversified (Johnson, 2014;Brien, in press). As a result, large numbers of international students now enrol in doctoral research degrees along with increasing numbers of professional workers who may have suitable, and even comprehensive, content knowledge, but little pre-existing experience, knowledge or skills in either planning, conducting or theorising formal research projects.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%