2019
DOI: 10.28945/4422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researching, Implementing, and Evaluating Industry Focused and Cross-Disciplinary Doctoral Training

Abstract: Aim/Purpose: This article reports on university-funded research conducted to inform, design and implement applied industry-integrated training that could support higher degree by research (HDR) candidates in the disciplines of nursing and creative arts. Background: Doctoral candidates contribute in steadily increasing numbers to the intellectual and economic capital of universities globally, however, the quality of candidate progression and outputs has also been widely criticised. How to best support doctora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was unsurprising to see methodological questions raised as troublesome by students, as it has been widely recognised that doctoral students often encounter complex methodological paradigms (and associated philosophical and scientific assumptions), methodologies and research tools for the first time once they are enrolled (Trafford and Lesham, 2009) and often struggle with being able to identify, articulate and justify a methodological approach that is valid, reliable and ethical for a proposed research question, population and objective (Owens et al, 2019). It was therefore quite unique that these students are suggesting that the discussion about appropriate methodology begins with a potential supervisor pre-enrolment.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was unsurprising to see methodological questions raised as troublesome by students, as it has been widely recognised that doctoral students often encounter complex methodological paradigms (and associated philosophical and scientific assumptions), methodologies and research tools for the first time once they are enrolled (Trafford and Lesham, 2009) and often struggle with being able to identify, articulate and justify a methodological approach that is valid, reliable and ethical for a proposed research question, population and objective (Owens et al, 2019). It was therefore quite unique that these students are suggesting that the discussion about appropriate methodology begins with a potential supervisor pre-enrolment.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%