Abstract:Objective We investigated whether time of birth, unit volume, and staff seniority affect neonatal outcome in neonates born at ≥34 +0 weeks of gestation.Design Population-based prospective cohort study.Setting Ten public hospitals in the Austrian province of Styria.Sample A total of 87 065 neonates delivered in the period 2004-2015.Methods Based on short-term outcome data, generalised linear mixed models were used to calculate the risk for adverse and severely adverse neonatal outcomes according to time of birt… Show more
“…The major body of existing literature on weekend effect in the field of perinatal medicine is focused on neonatal mortality 4‐9,30‐32 . The result of this study is consistent with the majority of studies conducted in the twenty‐first century 4‐9 in that it shows no increased risk for neonatal mortality among infants who were born during the weekend.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Among studies that employed the same or similar outcomes, the of this study contradict some previous studies conducted in European countries which found no significant association between weekend delivery and adverse outcomes. 4,10,11,13,32 An important factor that may explain the discrepancy between the current findings and previous research is the differences in the health care system, such as practice guidelines, access to hospitals and insurance coverage. For example, having adequate ANC was significantly associated with delivering during the weekdays (x = 373.21, P < .001) and was protective against having any neonatal adverse outcomes (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.87-0.89).…”
Section: T a B L Econtrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The major body of existing literature on weekend effect in the field of perinatal medicine is focused on neonatal mortality. [4][5][6][7][8][9][30][31][32] The result of this study is consistent with the majority of studies conducted in the twenty-first century [4][5][6][7][8][9] in that it shows no increased risk for neonatal mortality among infants who were born during the weekend. However, with advances in public health and neonatal medicine, neonatal mortality has decreased drastically worldwide.…”
Background
Childbirth is the most common cause of hospital admission in the United States. Previous studies have shown that there might be a “weekend effect” in perinatal care, indicating that mothers and newborns whose deliveries occur during the weekends are at increased risk of having adverse outcomes. This study aims to isolate the association between the weekend delivery and maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes by investigating low‐risk pregnancies in nationwide data.
Methods
A population‐based study of all low‐risk pregnancies (in‐hospital, nonanomalous, term, normal birthweight, and singleton) was conducted based on US national natality data in 2017. Four maternal outcomes (ICU admission, uterine rupture, blood transfusion, and perineal laceration) and three neonatal outcomes (5‐minute Apgar <7, NICU admission, and neonatal death) were defined as adverse outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association, adjusting for 23 maternal and neonatal characteristics and risk factors.
Results
Among 3 011 577 low‐risk pregnancies, 6.0% were reported to have at least one of the maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes. Weekend deliveries were significantly associated with six maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes with an exception of neonatal death. In general, weekend deliveries were 1.13 times significantly as likely to have any of seven maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes than weekday deliveries (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11‐1.14), being attributed to adverse outcomes of more than 4500 mother–newborn pairs.
Conclusions
Weekend delivery is a consistent risk factor for both mothers and babies at the national level. Furthermore, studies are needed about possible modifiable factors that mediate these associations to ensure safe childbirth regardless of the day of delivery.
“…The major body of existing literature on weekend effect in the field of perinatal medicine is focused on neonatal mortality 4‐9,30‐32 . The result of this study is consistent with the majority of studies conducted in the twenty‐first century 4‐9 in that it shows no increased risk for neonatal mortality among infants who were born during the weekend.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Among studies that employed the same or similar outcomes, the of this study contradict some previous studies conducted in European countries which found no significant association between weekend delivery and adverse outcomes. 4,10,11,13,32 An important factor that may explain the discrepancy between the current findings and previous research is the differences in the health care system, such as practice guidelines, access to hospitals and insurance coverage. For example, having adequate ANC was significantly associated with delivering during the weekdays (x = 373.21, P < .001) and was protective against having any neonatal adverse outcomes (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.87-0.89).…”
Section: T a B L Econtrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The major body of existing literature on weekend effect in the field of perinatal medicine is focused on neonatal mortality. [4][5][6][7][8][9][30][31][32] The result of this study is consistent with the majority of studies conducted in the twenty-first century [4][5][6][7][8][9] in that it shows no increased risk for neonatal mortality among infants who were born during the weekend. However, with advances in public health and neonatal medicine, neonatal mortality has decreased drastically worldwide.…”
Background
Childbirth is the most common cause of hospital admission in the United States. Previous studies have shown that there might be a “weekend effect” in perinatal care, indicating that mothers and newborns whose deliveries occur during the weekends are at increased risk of having adverse outcomes. This study aims to isolate the association between the weekend delivery and maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes by investigating low‐risk pregnancies in nationwide data.
Methods
A population‐based study of all low‐risk pregnancies (in‐hospital, nonanomalous, term, normal birthweight, and singleton) was conducted based on US national natality data in 2017. Four maternal outcomes (ICU admission, uterine rupture, blood transfusion, and perineal laceration) and three neonatal outcomes (5‐minute Apgar <7, NICU admission, and neonatal death) were defined as adverse outcomes. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association, adjusting for 23 maternal and neonatal characteristics and risk factors.
Results
Among 3 011 577 low‐risk pregnancies, 6.0% were reported to have at least one of the maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes. Weekend deliveries were significantly associated with six maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes with an exception of neonatal death. In general, weekend deliveries were 1.13 times significantly as likely to have any of seven maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes than weekday deliveries (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11‐1.14), being attributed to adverse outcomes of more than 4500 mother–newborn pairs.
Conclusions
Weekend delivery is a consistent risk factor for both mothers and babies at the national level. Furthermore, studies are needed about possible modifiable factors that mediate these associations to ensure safe childbirth regardless of the day of delivery.
“…Reif et al identified that while afternoon and nighttime births were associated with an increase in adverse neonatal outcomes, births occurring in a tertiary or perinatal care center and birth attendance by a senior staff member appeared to have a protective effect in high risk births despite the higher volume of patients cared for in these institutions and the potential for reduced personnel coverage during off hours 19 . This was observed in our data set, as nighttime births had a trend towards significance in having a full resuscitation team (p = 0.08), while daytime births were more likely to have a smaller resuscitation team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent literature suggests potentially worsened outcomes of neonates resuscitated at birth during evening and nighttime hours 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 . Shift length, shifts scheduled outside of typical daytime hours, and physician fatigue can result in increased patient load and capacity strain on perinatal providers during nighttime hours and potentially contribute to medical errors and poor outcomes 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 .…”
Introduction
Video recording and video evaluation tools have been successfully used to evaluate neonatal resuscitation performance. The objective of our study was to evaluate differences in Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) adherence at time of birth between three temporal resuscitative periods using scored video recordings.
Methods
This is a retrospective review of in-situ resuscitation video recordings from a level 3 perinatal center between 2017 and 2018. The modified Neonatal Resuscitation Assessment (mNRA) scoring tool was used as a surrogate marker to assess NRP adherence during daytime, evening, and nighttime hours.
Results
A total of 260 resuscitations, of which 258 were births via Cesarean section, were assessed. mNRA composite scores were 86.2% during daytime hours, 87% during evening hours, and 86.6% during nighttime hours. There were no significant differences in mNRA composite scores between any of the three time periods. Differences remained statistically similar after controlling for complexity of resuscitations with administration of positive pressure ventilation (PPV), intubation, or chest compressions.
Conclusion
Overall adherence to NRP, as measured by composite mNRA scores as a surrogate marker, was high across all three daily resuscitative periods without significant differences between daytime, evening, and nighttime hours.
Background
The aim of this study was to investigate whether time of birth, unit volume, and staff seniority impact the incidence of maternal complications in deliveries ≥34 + 0 gestational weeks.
Methods
We conducted a population‐based cross‐sectional study of 87 065 deliveries occurring between 2004 and 2015 in ten public hospitals in Styria, Austria. A composite adverse maternal outcome measure of uterine atony, postpartum hysterectomy, postpartum bleeding, impaired wound healing, postpartum infections requiring antibiotic treatment, sepsis, or maternal death was used to compare outcomes by time of birth, unit volume, and staff seniority. Based on delivery data, generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to calculate the risk of maternal adverse outcomes.
Results
Maternal adverse events occurred in 1.33% of deliveries. Incidence of maternal adverse events was highest for units with >1000 deliveries (adjusted OR 1.40; CI 95%: 1.16–1.69) and higher for perinatal centers (adjusted OR 1.35; CI 95%: 1.15–1.57) compared with reference units (500–1000 deliveries/year). Delivery during the daytime compared with the afternoon and nighttime did not affect the incidence of maternal complications (P = 0.765 and P = 0.136, respectively). Compared with resident‐guided deliveries, the odds ratio for an adverse event was the same when a consultant attended the delivery (adjusted OR 1.13; CI 95%: 0.98–1.30) but lower in deliveries managed by midwives only (adjusted OR 0.21; CI 95%: 0.07–0.64).
Conclusion
Procedures performed during the night shift were not associated with increased complication rates. Delivery volume and high‐volume centers were associated with the highest risk of maternal complications, and units with 500–1000 deliveries per year were the lowest. With increasing odds of pregnancy risks, these results change, and delivering in a high‐volume center becomes at least as safe as delivering in a smaller unit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.