2022
DOI: 10.1111/birt.12626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weekend delivery and maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes in low‐risk pregnancies in the United States: A population‐based analysis of 3‐million live births

Abstract: Background Childbirth is the most common cause of hospital admission in the United States. Previous studies have shown that there might be a “weekend effect” in perinatal care, indicating that mothers and newborns whose deliveries occur during the weekends are at increased risk of having adverse outcomes. This study aims to isolate the association between the weekend delivery and maternal–neonatal adverse outcomes by investigating low‐risk pregnancies in nationwide data. Methods A population‐based study of all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purposes of hospital organization, the allocation of human resources, and provider and support staff convenience, the timing of birth, at least in the United States, appears to have evolved into a pattern that is easier for the maternity care system to manage. A variety of studies of birth outcomes reference an “evening effect” and “weekend effect.” Some of these studies document poorer outcomes during evening and late night hours for both infants [ 45 48 ] and birthing people [ 49 ], as well as poorer outcomes on weekends [ 50 ], with organizational limitations in providing care during the night often seen as a contributing factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the purposes of hospital organization, the allocation of human resources, and provider and support staff convenience, the timing of birth, at least in the United States, appears to have evolved into a pattern that is easier for the maternity care system to manage. A variety of studies of birth outcomes reference an “evening effect” and “weekend effect.” Some of these studies document poorer outcomes during evening and late night hours for both infants [ 45 48 ] and birthing people [ 49 ], as well as poorer outcomes on weekends [ 50 ], with organizational limitations in providing care during the night often seen as a contributing factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of studies of birth outcomes reference an "evening effect" and "weekend effect." Some of these studies document poorer outcomes during evening and late night hours for both infants [45][46][47][48] and birthing people [49], as well as poorer outcomes on weekends [50], with organizational limitations in providing care during the night often seen as a contributing factor.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower tendency to extubate on weekends could be a contributing factor to prolonged duration of MV. Over the last decades, the weekend effect has been analyzed and discussed in several studies in both adult and maternal-neonatal settings (31)(32)(33)(34)(35). Still, the weekend phenomenon is not yet fully understood, emphasizing the need for further studies exploring actual weekend staffing in relation to respiratory neonatal outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A response to: Weekend delivery and maternal-neonatal adverse outcomes in low-risk pregnancies in the United States: A population-based analysis of 3 million live births Kim et al 1 report that weekend birth is associated with higher odds of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes compared with weekday birth and suggest that modifiable factors inherent to the weekend may underlie the observed higher risk. While they acknowledge that the occurrence of a greater proportion of high-risk births on the weekend could produce a similar finding, they contend that their analysis, which was designed to include only low-risk births and was adjusted for numerous risk factors, has adequately controlled for patient acuity.…”
Section: E T T E R T O T H E E D I T O Rmentioning
confidence: 99%