2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12942-016-0068-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do the risk factors for type 2 diabetes mellitus vary by location? A spatial analysis of health insurance claims in Northeastern Germany using kernel density estimation and geographically weighted regression

Abstract: BackgroundThe provision of general practitioners (GPs) in Germany still relies mainly on the ratio of inhabitants to GPs at relatively large scales and barely accounts for an increased prevalence of chronic diseases among the elderly and socially underprivileged populations. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is one of the major cost-intensive diseases with high rates of potentially preventable complications. Provision of healthcare and access to preventive measures is necessary to reduce the burden of T2DM. Howe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(86 reference statements)
2
33
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…One final note is that MGWR and the best practices suggested here may hold merit for other health outcomes, data sources, and research questions. For example, GWR has already been applied to study obesity-related behaviors (Feuillet et al, 2015;Maroko et al, 2009), type 2 diabetes (Kauhl et al, 2016), and cancers (Cheng et al, 2011;St-Hilaire et al, 2010), and it could be beneficial to extend these inquiries through the use of MGWR. Furthermore, a finer measurement scale was pursued here than is typically utilized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One final note is that MGWR and the best practices suggested here may hold merit for other health outcomes, data sources, and research questions. For example, GWR has already been applied to study obesity-related behaviors (Feuillet et al, 2015;Maroko et al, 2009), type 2 diabetes (Kauhl et al, 2016), and cancers (Cheng et al, 2011;St-Hilaire et al, 2010), and it could be beneficial to extend these inquiries through the use of MGWR. Furthermore, a finer measurement scale was pursued here than is typically utilized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a de nite increase of continuity in age group 40-59, compared to other age groups. Continuity was distinctively lower in young age (20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39), which can partly be explained by mild severity, less complication, and more frequent residential migration of the group. However, current phenomenon can pose an impending threat to the working population since legacy effect of diabetes has been recently reported 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2019 American Diabetes Association guideline recommends that diabetes patients should meet their primary care givers every 2 to 3 months 2,25 . Moreover, prevalence of diabetes is closely related to residential location 26 , which implies local physicians can manage their patients in a more customized, communicative manner. In order to further improve continuity of care, we need a policy that would geographically align the supply and demand of chronic care needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Der Ansatz, der bei den angewendeten Kennzahlen verfolgt wird, ist immer raumorientiert (Wennberg und Gittelsohn 1973;Wennberg 2010Wennberg 2014 (Mangiapane 2014) genutzt. In den Routinedaten der Krankenkassen sind neben den krankheitsbezogenen Informationen auch Angaben zum Wohnort der Versicherten enthalten, sodass kleinräumig sehr differenzierte Auswertungen möglich sind (Kauhl et al 2016). Sofern eine Krankenkasse bundesweit flächendeckend tätig ist, können mit deren Routinedaten also kleinräumige Untersuchungen zum Gesundheitszustand durchgeführt werden.…”
Section: Nutzen Kleinräumiger Darstellungen Des Gesundheitszustandesunclassified