1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01111876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do special education teachers use IEPs to guide instruction?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This concern was underscored by the fact that the IEP was not very accessible for some of the teachers surveyed. Similar findings on teachers' views of the lack of the instructional relevance of IEPs have been reported elsewhere (Margolis & Truesdell, 1987;Morgan & Rhode, 1983). …”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…This concern was underscored by the fact that the IEP was not very accessible for some of the teachers surveyed. Similar findings on teachers' views of the lack of the instructional relevance of IEPs have been reported elsewhere (Margolis & Truesdell, 1987;Morgan & Rhode, 1983). …”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Yapılan araştırmalara göre, incelenen BEP' lerin, amaç ve hedeflerinin öğrenci ihtiyaç ve özelliklerini yansıtmadığı yönünde tekrar eden bulgular dikkat çekmektedir. Buna bağlı olarak ta BEP' in program bileşenleri arasındaki bağlantının zayıf olduğu ve eğitimciye rehber olmadığı görülmektedir (Morgan & Rhode, 1983;Dudley-Marling, 1985;Fiedler & Knight, 1986;Margolis & Truesdell, 1987;Reiher, 1992;Siegel, 2017). Ayrıca, BEP amaç ve hedeflerini yazarken önerilen ile uygulama arasındaki bir boşluk olduğu belirtilmektedir (Bricker ve diğerleri, 1998;Grisham-Brown & Hemmeter, 1998).…”
Section: öZetunclassified
“…IEP goals and objectives are not closely aligned with educational needs identified by assessment data. And, there is infrequent congruence between statements of the student's present level of performance and annual goals (Fiedler & Knight, 1986;Hunt & Farron-Davis, 1992;Margolis & Truesdell, 1987;Michnowicz et al, 1995;Nevin et al, 1983;Reiher, 1992;Smith, 1990a;Smith & Simpson, 1989). Under these circumstances, IEPs are unlikely to protect student rights.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%