2014
DOI: 10.3922/j.psns.2014.4.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do socioeconomic status and stress reactivity really impact neurocognitive performance?

Abstract: Various discussions have centered on whether and how socioeconomic status and stress are associated with neurocognitive function in different stages of development. Reviews have been conducted focusing on only part of these relationships (SES and stress or SES and neurocognition). The aim of the present study was to review investigations that examined the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES), stress (assessed by cortisol levels and allostatic load), and neurocognitive performance (executive function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lacking financial resources, therefore, constitutes a direct threat to people’s innate need to view themselves as capable of overcoming challenges and achieving desired outcomes in daily life (Hughes and Demo, 1989; Boardman and Robert, 2000; Fritsche and Jugert, 2017; Cannon et al, 2018). This conception corroborates with research showing that the financially deprived experience more stress and uncertainty, feel less power to influence their environment, and perceive more difficulty to accomplish daily tasks (Lachman and Weaver, 1998; Cohen S. et al, 2006; Haushofer and Fehr, 2014; Piccolo et al, 2014; Robinson and Piff, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Lacking financial resources, therefore, constitutes a direct threat to people’s innate need to view themselves as capable of overcoming challenges and achieving desired outcomes in daily life (Hughes and Demo, 1989; Boardman and Robert, 2000; Fritsche and Jugert, 2017; Cannon et al, 2018). This conception corroborates with research showing that the financially deprived experience more stress and uncertainty, feel less power to influence their environment, and perceive more difficulty to accomplish daily tasks (Lachman and Weaver, 1998; Cohen S. et al, 2006; Haushofer and Fehr, 2014; Piccolo et al, 2014; Robinson and Piff, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Low SES represents an ecological niche where stressors are often unpredictable, uncontrollable, and chronic (Baum, Garofalo, & Yali, 1999). Quite a bit of evidence exists linking low SES to dysregulated physiological stress reactivity (e.g., Evans, 2013; Musante et al, 2000) and in turn to poor developmental outcomes (Piccolo, Sbicigo, Grassi-Oliveira, & Fumagalli de Salles, 2014; Sripada, Swain, Evans, Welsh, & Liberzon, 2014).…”
Section: Environmental Adversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family SES, especially during early childhood, seem to affect performance in some neuropsychological systems more than in others, particularly memory (episodic, working and semantic), oral and written language and executive functions (Hackman et al 2010;Piccolo et al 2014) -in this study, we will investigate that cognitive functions. Such influence is more prominent at younger ages (Tomalski et al 2013), until about ten years old (Lupien et al 2001), probably due to their complexity and prolonged development (Evans and Fuller-Rowell 2013;Noble et al 2006Noble et al , 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%