2016
DOI: 10.1186/s41155-016-0016-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of family socioeconomic status on IQ, language, memory and executive functions of Brazilian children

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of family socioeconomic status (SES) and parental education on non-verbal IQ and on the processing of oral and written language, working memory, verbal memory and executive functions in children from different age ranges. A total of 419 Brazilian children aged 6-12 years old, attending public and private schools from Porto Alegre, RS participated in the study. Structural equation analyzes revealed that in the general model (for all ages), the SES contributed to co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
46
1
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(87 reference statements)
8
46
1
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the well‐established socio‐economic gradient of executive functions (e.g. Hackman, Gallop, Evans, & Farah, ; Obradović, Portilla, & Ballard, ; Ursache & Noble, ) has also been found low and middle income countries (Brazil: Fernald, Weber, Galasso, & Ratsifandrihamanana, ; Madagascar: Piccolo, Arteche, Fonseca, Grassi‐Oliveira, & Salles, ), other evidence suggests that the influence of promotive‐ and risk‐factors may differ based on unique social‐cultural backgrounds (Gonen et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the well‐established socio‐economic gradient of executive functions (e.g. Hackman, Gallop, Evans, & Farah, ; Obradović, Portilla, & Ballard, ; Ursache & Noble, ) has also been found low and middle income countries (Brazil: Fernald, Weber, Galasso, & Ratsifandrihamanana, ; Madagascar: Piccolo, Arteche, Fonseca, Grassi‐Oliveira, & Salles, ), other evidence suggests that the influence of promotive‐ and risk‐factors may differ based on unique social‐cultural backgrounds (Gonen et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11] Parental education and occupation, family income, nutritional status and housing conditions, among other factors, may limit the provision of material and social resources for children, which in turn impacts their overall development. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] As such, the influence of income on material resources that can provide intellectually stimulating activities such as toys and books may contribute to child development. 19 When family dysfunction occurs during sensitive stages of child development, the effects are even more pronounced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is mainly due to advances in science and technology and application of new knowledge to society towards sustainable development and the welfare of the common citizen (Meis and Leta, 1997). However, there is some concern related to worn off of natural resources, environmental pollution, child poverty and cognitive development and the negative results of science and the lack of role models of scientists to be followed by pupils (Piccolo et al, 2016). A better understanding of science education aims in primary and secondary schools may contribute to reduce the human technology conflict faced by pupils (Meis, 2002;Sjoberg, 2000Sjoberg, , 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%