2020
DOI: 10.1177/0974686220966810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Shareholder Activism Effect Corporate Governance and Related Party Transactions: Evidences from India?

Abstract: The study investigates the relationship between corporate governance performance, related party transactions and shareholder activism among listed firms in India. The study provides valuable insights into the impact of shareholder activism on corporate governance performance (CGP) and the occurrence of related party transactions (RPTs). Results infer a significant difference in overall CGP between the firms subjected to shareholder activism and firms not subjected to shareholder activism. The study proposes si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing research in the area of SA in India suggests that SA has gained momentum over the past decade (Shingade et al, 2022a(Shingade et al, , 2022bIslam et al, 2020;Islam, 2020), and there has been a significant increase in the number of proposals rejected by shareholders since the implementation of various regulatory and policy reforms (Shingade et al, 2022a(Shingade et al, , 2022b Investigations into the impact of SA on the firm-level variables in India revealed a significant increase in the performance of the firm post-SA (Islam, 2020). However, a shred of contrasting evidence has also been proposed, suggesting that there is no significant impact of SA on performance measures, including valuation, profitability, margins and return results (Shingade et al, 2022a(Shingade et al, , 2022b.…”
Section: Unfolding Of Shareholder Activism In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Existing research in the area of SA in India suggests that SA has gained momentum over the past decade (Shingade et al, 2022a(Shingade et al, , 2022bIslam et al, 2020;Islam, 2020), and there has been a significant increase in the number of proposals rejected by shareholders since the implementation of various regulatory and policy reforms (Shingade et al, 2022a(Shingade et al, , 2022b Investigations into the impact of SA on the firm-level variables in India revealed a significant increase in the performance of the firm post-SA (Islam, 2020). However, a shred of contrasting evidence has also been proposed, suggesting that there is no significant impact of SA on performance measures, including valuation, profitability, margins and return results (Shingade et al, 2022a(Shingade et al, , 2022b.…”
Section: Unfolding Of Shareholder Activism In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…India has a different ownership structure of listed companies in comparison to other developed countries, wherein the majority of the listed companies are family-owned and managed, hence giving rise to a conflict of different nature (Sarkar et al , 2012). Corporate governance policies and procedures have been mainly directed to address the conflict of interest between majority shareholders and minority shareholders, rather than the conflict of interest between principal and agent as evident in most developed countries (Islam, 2020; Gupta, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Wasan and Mulchandani [ 10 ] examined 182 firms listed on S&P BSE 500 from 2010 to 2018. Islam [ 11 ] utilized data from 322 firms for a period spanning from 2008 to 2015. Accordingly, there is a lack of research that assess RPTs in the context of financial institutions in India.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the amendments, publicly listed firms are required mandatorily to disclose the transaction of RPTs with its related parties in their annual report, and minority shareholders are empowered to raise their concerns about RPTs of a firm by voting and/or by a nominated board member. Further, Islam [ 11 ] states that the listed companies are obliged to disclose the details of RPTs in their annual reports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%